Talk:Carrier strike group

Military history: Aviation / Maritime / North America / United States B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Rank in command

What rank is in command of a CSG? Rear Admiral? 75.157.163.55 (talk) 04:25, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CSG Commanders are typically 1-star (RMDL). They often get promoted during that tour to 2-star (RADM).E2a2j (talk) 16:50, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More specific information

In this article there is reference to several Carrier Strike Groups (CCSG-2, CCSG-7, CCSG-9). This should be detailed in this article using appropriate sources. __meco (talk) 10:24, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List update for 2010

Will have to do some additional research, but it appears the list Carrier_Strike_Group#The_CSGs may be out of date. Especially for CSG-2 on the USS George H.W. Bush, which is getting a new commander, Rear Admiral Nora Tyson[1], the first female CSG commander, on July 28, 2010[2]. — MrDolomite • Talk 16:34, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't in as bad shape as I first thought, I found references for many of the list entries under "COMCARSTRKGRU NUMBER", still need a few more. — MrDolomite • Talk 16:53, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some confusion

This article appears to conflate the Air Group and the Task Group and it's not entirely clear which it's about. the introductory paragraph implies that the CSG is the entire task group; Carrier, Air Group, Escort Group, logistics support. Later in the article it looks as if the CSG is just the Air Group, with this being reinforced by the list that indicates what platform the CSG is embarked in.

Can someone with some better knowledge of this please clarify what the meaining is.

ALR (talk) 13:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:13, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Carrier Strike Group → Carrier strike group — Like carrier battle group, this is not a proper noun. Srnec (talk) 03:28, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Support per nom. ^walk victor falk^talk 00:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support as stated from the official U.S. Navy website, carrier strike group should only be capitalize when used with the name of a ship, i.e. the Enterprise Carrier Strike Group. Neovu79 (talk) 01:47, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.