User talk:Aoidh

Want to leave me a message? Please click here to add a new subject to my talk page.

Archives

Welcome

Please feel free to leave me a message! :) (Older messages are stored in the archives found to the right) - SudoGhost (talk) 02:45, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi are you from the Philippines? If not then I don't think you have a right to judge the article and be subjected for deletion.

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 03:47, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. :) - SudoGhost (talk) 03:05, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]B&Q......what exactly are you trying to do?!raseaC^{talk to me} 20:48, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]Well apparently I'm trying to break the article. :) But no, chalk that up to me not paying attention. I've reverted that silly edit I made, and attempted to open an invitation for discussion on the talk page. - SudoGhost (talk) 20:50, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] Yeah, I've tried that. And on the user's talk. Not sure it's going to happen. I thought it was an open and shut case, there's little reason to have it in the article but didn't want to get into an edit war. raseaC^{talk to me} 20:52, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] Well, I managed to not break anything this time, so hopefully the other editor will take this opportunity to use the discussion page.. - SudoGhost (talk) 20:57, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]Abhira Tribei am trying to correct this factually wrong article but you are disrupting my correct editing.this is against the spirit of wikipediaI respectfully disagree. I invite you to open a discussion on the talk page, so that people can reach a consensus as to the edits you have proposed. I am not the only one who has reverted your edits, and I have done so because it seems that you are removing valid, sourced information (usually having to do with any positive mention of the British people) and are replacing it with content you feel is more appropriate. In this instance (when multiple users have reverted your edits), it is best to use the aforementioned talk page to explain why you feel these edits should be made, and allow the users to make a consensus either towards or against the changes. - SudoGhost (talk) 04:53, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] this article showing only one sided point of view of controversial origin of abhira.i am presenting another and morte accepted point of view today. Again, I ask that you please use the talk page to discuss this before reinserting the changes. - SudoGhost (talk) 05:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]ok thanks for guide.i have edited now with reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ancient indian historian (talk • contribs) 05:10, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]Please helpOkay, so even despite everything noone seems to notice reality. But, come on now, is it really okay for a Wikipedia user to be blocked and then to use another account a few minutes later? See this edit and this one from this blocked user. If such a black-and-white violation of the rules will be approved then I swear to God this place is useless. I'm totally deleting my account and starting another then. Sugar-Baby-Love (talk) 06:13, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]