User talk:Aoidh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Randy Gage[edit]

I have added a Viewpoints section which establishes notability with links to articles in,, HuffingtonPost, Chicago Tribune, and Success Magazine. This is similar to a section in the Wikipedia article for Seth Godin: Could you please remove the Notability tag with this new information? Thanks. TriJenn (talk) 20:15, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Moving comments[edit]

Seriously, move my comment again and I'll report it. Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 21:27, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

As I said in the edit summary, you put your comment in the middle of mine, which was broken into two paragraphs for ease of reading, not because they were separate comments. Per WP:TPO: It is generally inappropriate to...add replies in the middle of another editor's post. Instead, add your reply at an appropriate point after the other editor's signature, using proper threading and indentation. Your comment was placed directly in the middle of my own, so that one half of my comment had no signature and took half the context away. You are welcome to report that at the appropriate noticeboard, but you are not welcome to break my comment up as you see fit. Sorry, but that's how it is. - Aoidh (talk) 21:44, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Templates for discussion[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Templates for discussion. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

RfC: red links in navboxes[edit]

Aoidh, would you accept a revised red link guideline that requires a minimum of three blue links in a navbox to existing stand-alone articles or lists, with at least 50% of all included links withing the navbox being blue, coupled with a very explicit clarification of the existing "succession" and "complete set" exceptions for navboxes? Personally, I think that would be an extremely reasonable compromise. If I can get 10 committed supporters, I'm ready to start lobbying previous !voters (not a violation of WP:CANVASS) in favor of compromise. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 02:47, 26 June 2015 (UTC)