Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sadads (talk | contribs) at 10:31, 28 April 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Autopatrolled (add request)

User:TomPointTwo

I create BLPs on contemporary military figures and battles. I'm planning on starting to increase the ratio of my time dedicated to editing WP doing these things. I've edited for years, understand BLP and always utilize incline citation in my articles. I haven't yet had a new article challenged. TomPointTwo (talk) 23:48, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-admin noter User created 9 articles. Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 21:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Right. I know it's not a huge stack of new articles on this account (I have another from years ago, the use of which I've discontinued for privacy reasons) but I figure it does more good to request it before, rather than after I create the articles I have in the pipe. TomPointTwo (talk) 15:57, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note As an indication of my work and that I can be trusted not to create inappropriate articles here are two I've created since requesting autopartoled status, Michael Canavan and Richard Scholtes. I'd ask that an administrator respond to this request, even if to deny it. I'd like to de-watchlist this page and move on. TomPointTwo (talk) 16:36, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. I'm sorry, but this flag is only meant for prolific article creators, who have a track record of creating good articles that don't need patrolling, in order to reduce the load for New Page Patrollers. The articles you've created so far are good, but I believe this request is still a tad premature. Salvio Let's talk about it! 00:07, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ineuw

Autopatrolled privilege would aid my process of article creation of authors from information I collect while proofreading in Wikisource, where I currently do most of my work. This would involve a process of 24-36 hours at most for properly format and complete an article. Information I collect should be part of a Wikipedia page, rather than Wikisource, where we only keep minimal author info with a list of their publications and for more detail, we provide a direct link to Wikipedia. Ineuw talk page on English Wikisource 03:47, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

:P.S: I forgot to mention that occasionally I would be workin on several pages simultaneously and that is the main reason for my request.Ineuw talk page on English Wikisource 03:53, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin note User created 7 articles. Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 21:53, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While here on Wikipedia I only created 8 articles in the past two years, I am a member of good standing for the past 8 years and have done thousands of edits and corrections. Also, my seven articles are painstaking translations from foreign languages — Hungarian and French, — which is a lot more difficult process than creating dozens of basic article pages devoid of any meaningful information — essentially page titles. Furthermore, I am a prolific contributor to both Wikisource where I contribute thousands of new pages, and on Wikimedia Commons, where so far this year I contributed some ~5,000 images. My request for autopatrolled status is directly related to my Wikisource work, as explained above, and if this doesn't qualify me, then I respectfully withdraw my request. Ineuw talk page on English Wikisource 00:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Thank you for your good work on translations. I do a lot of translating myself and cannot therefore see how autopatrolled rights would enhance your work. Do consider reapplying when you have created around 50 articles. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:11, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Faizanalivarya

I joined Wikipedia on 01:41, 27 October 2010, contributed Wikipedia by creating articles and my edits, I have history of 1,610 till date, did more than 300 Edits in a month, as I do understand and respect the rules policies therefore I would love to serve my Wikipedia world because I think I am addictive of Wikipedia, I love sharing my knowledge to everyone in words I am trying to improve my quality therefore you can see my recent articles are more better then old one, therefore as its a first step to my dream to become the administrator of Wikipedia kindly award me with rights Faizanalivarya (talk) 05:03, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-admin note User created 10 articles. Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 21:54, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Unfortunately autopatroller is not an award for good editing. It is designed for prolific article creators in order to reduce the load for New Page Patrollers. Please request again when you have created around 50 articles. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:05, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kiwipat

Long-time user and regular contributor of well-referenced articles. The AFDs and PRODs on his talkpage seem to mostly for early creations and articles to which he only contributed. In any case I imagine it's hard to create 265 articles without a few notices. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 04:58, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Ruslik_Zero 10:45, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Slowking4

Creates a lot of well referenced stubs on public art and biographies and is very prolific in writing Sadads (talk) 10:22, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Too many recent issues with PROD and non-free image uploads. The effort should be to prepare your stubs with adequate references and image FUR before posting them to mainspace. Please also begin to correctly format the naked URLs in the references. For the moment New Page Patrolling is still required. Please reapply when you have addressed these issues. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jasonakagary88

Has been creating well referenced F.C. club seasons and players since he arrived last year, and he has been doing really well at creating good content Sadads (talk) 05:26, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:51, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sainsf

Regularly creates well referenced articles on species and has considerable experience cleaning up and expanding articles and no cause for concern on his talk page Sadads (talk) 06:16, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:39, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Schmiebel

Regularly creates well referenced articles on creeks and rivers, and regularly makes valuable edits throughout the project Sadads (talk) 06:27, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Dabomb87 (talk) 23:24, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Robert.Allen

This user has contributed 49 well-referenced articles and several DYKs. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 00:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 00:48, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Camerafiend

Has created over 100 articles, you can see them on the userpage. Minima© (talk) 05:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:02, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Paul Bedson

Regularly creates well referenced articles, has close to 100 now. Sadads (talk) 10:31, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]