Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Shortcuts
Please read Wikipedia:Autopatrolled before requesting or nominating another user for this right. Applicants will not be granted this right if they have not created at least 25 new articles on the English Wikipedia, excluding redirects and disambiguation pages. These articles should be free of problems requiring the attention of patrollers. Note that this right will not help you create or patrol articles.

User:TheRichic

Hello! I formally request the autopatrolled user right. I'm a regular user of Wikipedia, both in English and Spanish, and I consider that, after so many years and hundreds of articles created on both wikis, i am in the position to say that I know the rules and styles. I've never cared much about user rights, but now that I've started a personal project (ambassadors of Spain and all its lists) to expand diplomatic information about my country, Spain, I'd like to avoid the workload that comes with reviewing articles that comply with our rules. Thank you. TheRichic (Messages here) 11:12, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheRichic: why is Francisco Javier Conde de Saro notable? voorts (talk/contributions) 01:20, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:ႧႤႧႰႨ ႾႠႰႨ

Hello! I formally request the Autopatrolled user right. I'm a regular user of Wikipedia, both in Turkish and English. I have contributed to the Turkish Wikipedia, particularly on the Tao-Klarjeti region. I have also started to transfer these contributions to the English Wikipedia. I think it would be good to reduce the workload involved in reviewing the items I have written. Thank you. --ႧႤႧႰႨ ႾႠႰႨ (talk) 15:32, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Aeternus

I have been editing Wikipedia since 2006, have created numerous new articles, edited countless others, and am very familiar with its policies. Λeternus (talk) 12:46, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Michelangelo1992

I've periodically patrolled Michelangelo1992's articles, and consistently found them to be in good shape. Focused on books as a topic area and very clear familiarity with WP:NBOOK. He's created 135 articles. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 22:56, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Michelangelo1992: I'm a little concerned about overly lengthy quotations. Would you commit to summarizing quotations a bit more? Also, see MOS:SAID. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:24, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the feedback! I’ve always trended toward direct quotes to avoid concerns for original research, but I can make an effort to paraphrase more in the future while still citing the original source. I’ll also try to be more mindful of WP:SAID. I thought I was doing fairly well with this, but I am always open to feedback particularly if you have specific suggestions relating to recent articles. Thank you! Michelangelo1992 (talk) 14:37, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:BenTanXiaoMing

Have been creating several new articles recently, and I understand the policies and guidelines behind articles. BenTanXiaoMing (talk) 20:45, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fade258

Hi. I was granted a temporary autopatrolled rights which is going to be expired on 15 November. I didn't create any articles within this period but improve some articles and plan to create or expand more. I request to make it permanent, If I meet the criteria. Thank You! Fade258 (talk) 11:06, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Dr vulpes (expires 00:00, 15 November 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 11:10, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Dr vulpes,@Dclemens1971 Thoughts? Sohom (talk) 19:48, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) Thanks for ping Sohom Datta. Without any new pages to go off of, I don't know that there's a strong rationale for autopatrolled since the user is not yet creating pages at a pace where reviewing them is a burden to patrollers. The user did expand one previously created redirect; it includes one sentence that is copied from a source (see here). I'd also be curious to find out what happened with these pages, Fade258: [1], [2]. Did you nominate them for speedy deletion or were they left for patrollers to find and fix? Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:46, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Dclemens1971, Thanks for your comments. I aggree with you and I have modified the text which you have mentioned above. Regarding those two redirects above, I didn't nominate them for speedy deletion. If I remember correctly then, Mistakley, I created a redirect in article's talk page instead of article main page, for first redirect i.e 4. For second redirect i.e 5; It was deleted by @Jay: through RfD on 1 August 2025, where I created a redirect since there is an information about the Albuquerque: THE MOVIE in target redirect title but later removed citing notability concerns and references. I hope you understand. Thank You! Fade258 (talk) 01:27, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) @Sohom Datta In addition to the example of minor copying from a source that Dclemens1971 had pointed out, Fade258 has received two recent copyright warnings for their edits to Hobsonia florida: [3] [4]. Given that one of the guidelines for granting autopatrolled is a familiarity with copyright policy, I'm not sure that their autopatrolled right should be extended at this time. MCE89 (talk) 02:07, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done per above. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 08:17, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Autopatrolled&oldid=1321370848"