Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Autopatrolled

@Captain Galaxy has created 32 articles, with only 1 of those being deleted five years ago (per WP:A7). Since then, @CG has created well sourced and well written articles, such as Cow (Mario) and Chibi-Robo! Zip Lash, along with 9 other GAs. I recently reviewed CloverPit as part of the ongoing backlog drive, and found no issues. @CG has had many successful DYK nominations, as can be seen by their talk page history. I am confident that @CG's articles do not require reviewing by NPP and can be trusted with the AP right! Thank you @CG for your contributions to WP:Video games! 11WB (talk) 20:45, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 22:34, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have been editing Wikipedia for around six years and have created over 100 articles, as well as many redirects. The articles I create are typically reviewed without issues, and I am familiar with the relevant policies. I am requesting autopatrolled rights to help reduce the workload of New Pages Patrol. Thank you for considering my request. Zuck28 (talk) 21:15, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Zuck28, would you be able to explain what happened at Ladakh International Music Festival? It looks like some of your changes had to be revision-deleted as copyright violations. (Non-administrator comment) TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:22, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it was due to a copyright issue. It happened in February 2025. Zuck28 (talk) 21:38, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) This attack page notice from @Fram is quite concerning. Whilst it occurred five months ago, this is still fairly recent. There is also a WP:COI warning from admin @Deb three months ago. Your recent article Kajheri was tagged by @Gnomingstuff in November. @GS is a very experienced and active member of WP:AIC, so I trust that this is a legitimate flag. This LLM notice from @Jeraxmoira in October also shows a potentially ongoing problem with LLM use. I am not going to formally oppose, but these issues definitely raise legitimate concerns around article creation. Especially with a permission that would allow articles to skip the review feed. 11WB (talk) 22:29, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further reading of this reply from @BusterD, I will have to unfortunately oppose. My advice to @Zuck28 would be to focus on creating articles with reliable sources for the time being. 11WB (talk) 22:33, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Sorry @Moneytrees, I didn't see your message! 11WB (talk) 22:34, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have been editing for a few years and have created 94 articles so far, none of which have been deleted (or nominated for deletion, outside of a recent misunderstanding). I believe I have a pretty firm understanding of Wikipedia's guidelines at this point. Staryu 06:23, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]