Jump to content

User talk:0

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cooldenny (talk | contribs) at 13:34, 5 May 2011 (→‎Proposed deletion of Tabitha King). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Not here

Hi. Please post comments on users' talk page, not their user page, which is for their own use. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 01:34, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)

answered on your talk 192.121.232.191 01:41, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Historical statue

You should upload http://joi.ito.com/vert.jimmy.statue.jpg

Can

Hi, can I take/have your account? You'll have to msg me on user:100110100. Thanks!68.148.164.134 21:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit(s) to Wikipedia:Sandbox were believed to be unconstructive, and so have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any further testing, and have a look at our welcome page if you wish to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Majorly (talk) 15:14, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tabitha King

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tabitha King, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bongomatic (talk) 12:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi 0. I am not sure you took part in the survey because I never contacted you. But I can see your user name on the data collected. if you really took part in, I appreciate for completing the survey two weeks ago. I would like to return your favor with a reward of an online gift card with no condition. Please leave your email address in the final version of survey of my project. In addition, you can get chance to win $50 worth of gift card. It takes only 10 minutes to complete the final version because it contains only 35 questions. Thank you so much. cooldenny (talk) 13:34, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]