User talk:Mato

User:Mato


User	Talk

Please leave a new message.

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7

Account on sh.wiki

It is free. --OC Ripper (talk) 07:58, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. Mato (talk) 11:46, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good Faith

The edit was described as Gratuitous. "Gratuitous" explains the edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.195.97.215 (talk) 20:25, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You could say that about anything. It might be best to explain why you think that in the future. Mato (talk) 20:29, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you being argumentative? You claimed that there was "no explanation." 74.195.97.215 (talk) 20:57, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure where you got that quote from, but you're right, I should apologise - I used a template which implied that you had not entered an edit summary, which you did. I will therefore remove it from your talk page. I should, instead, have placed a message saying that your edit summary was insufficient. Mato (talk) 21:02, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY: Here is a more fully developed explanation for you. Wikipedia's alleged good faith policy (I have not found it to be true) is not relevant to the definition of bona fides (i.e., good faith). It would be like writing an entry about "great guy" and then using myself as an example of what constitutes a great guy. As previously stated, it is gratuitous (i.e., without apparent reason or justification).

Santiago Muñez

Would you like to have a look at that revert you made to Santiago Muñez - I'd just reverted further and I think we edit conflicted and you've inadvertently re-added some invalid content. This is a fictional character isn't it? —SMALL JIM 21:27, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well would you look at that! Yes it seems we edit conflicted and I reverted to a poor revision, completely missing the fact that it is a fictional character. Sorry I should have been more careful there - thanks for pointing it out. Mato (talk) 21:35, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - thanks for your good work fighting those vandals. —SMALL JIM 21:43, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mato@cs.wiki

I renamed your account Tomayres to (usurped account) Mato as requested. Enjoy contributing to cs.wikipedia. --Tchoř (talk) 00:20, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Mato (talk) 00:33, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BRazil-China relations

Hi, I changed a table, but did something wrong... Can you make the tekst below come out of the table? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JanHop (talk • contribs) 14:17, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The entire section has been removed by another editor because there were no sources. If you wish to re-add the information, you must provide references. Mato (talk) 14:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More particularly, he has to add references that actually support the material. The Brazil factsheet does not do so. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk(P) 15:26, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, should have made that a bit clearer. Mato (talk) 15:28, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

And you reverted my revert of vandalism.... why?Roodog2k (talk) 14:32, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Because I hate you and I love vandals~~. A quick look at my contributions would tell you that it was likely accidental. Furthermore it would tell you that I explained my mistake on Vrenator's talk page, the editor who reverted my revert. Mato (talk) 14:38, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

K Roodog2k (talk) 14:42, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

what did I do?