Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Web Analytics

Open Web Analytics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails our requirements for notability, the notability tag on the article is more than 2 years old. I made an attempt to find coverage of the article in reliable sources but couldn't. Currently the article only uses blogs and the software's own wiki as references. The article was created and primarily edited by the software's author (Peter Adams). -- Atama頭 23:19, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Atama頭 23:33, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Atama頭 23:33, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'd say that Wikimedia using this software as Web Analytics for the WMF and all its wikis count as a reliable source. Article simply needs updating with references. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - Really? Is something notable because it's used by Wikimedia? I must have missed that part of WP:N. If you can find reliable sources, by all means present them, and I'll consider withdrawing this nomination. Otherwise I don't understand your argument at all. -- Atama頭 17:11, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Use by Wikimedia is not sufficient for WP:N and I can't find much in the way of coverage, just some brief mentions in lists of other similar products. Tijfo098 (talk) 15:17, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nominator and Tijfo098. Perchloric (talk) 16:47, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]