Talk:Rotoscoping
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rotoscoping article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Film: Filmmaking Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
Animation Start‑class Top‑importance | ||||||||||
|
I think a before and after could demonstrate this wellBrando26000 (talk) 21:11, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'd be happy to license this image as necessary. Only provision is that it must be attributed with a hyperlink to -----deleted----- - James Foster (talk) 13:14, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
- Of course you would be happy to place some no-cost sales promotion here for your product. But Wikipedia is NOT an advertising opportunity. So thanks but no thanks! --93.135.106.205 (talk) 13:13, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- I offered to license an image that would be useful to the article under a license that is compatible with Wikipedia, and I did it on this page (not the article) so that it could be added in a neutral way. In your opinion that means you need to edit my comment on the discussion page and delete parts of it, but I doubt many Wikipedia editors would agree that attributing an image is advertising. - James Foster (talk) 05:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
- Of course you would be happy to place some no-cost sales promotion here for your product. But Wikipedia is NOT an advertising opportunity. So thanks but no thanks! --93.135.106.205 (talk) 13:13, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
"Talk to Chuck"
I'd suggest that more people have seen this technique in the Charles Schwab brokerage ad series than anywhere else in recent times. Is anyone expert in who is behind these ads, specific techniques used, what inspired them, etc.? Verifiable info on this would add much to the article. 75.252.134.58 (talk) 03:01, 14 May 2011 (UTC)