Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stary Olsa

Stary Olsa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find sufficient RS coverage to warrant notability under wp's rules. Epeefleche (talk) 00:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Y'know, them being a Belorussian band with 8 albums under their belt, I'm totally ready to say we should Ignore All Rules and keep here, regardless. Sufficient career achievement. Carrite (talk) 04:26, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Carrite. So, is your thinking that they aren't otherwise notable, if we apply the same rules to them that we apply to, say, Australian bands?--Epeefleche (talk) 05:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:05, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - To place Stary Olsa for deletion is utterly ridiculous. It is probably one of the most successful modern Belarusian bands, they tour in all surrounding countries.--Czalex 21:15, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – the band successfully revives the musical traditions of Belarusian Middle Ages, is well-known in Belarus, frequently tours other countries, released many albums, etc. At this time this is the most successful band playing Belarusian Ethnic/Folk music. The request for deletion of this article makes no sense. Juras14 (talk) 23:40, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Not sure what you mean by "RS coverage"? There is enough coverage of this famous band online. E.g. [of videos on YouTube], and >100000 links in Google for the original name "Стары Ольса" --Monk (talk) 06:31, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]