User talk:Mato

User:Mato


User	Talk

Please leave a new message.

If I leave you a message, please answer on your talk page and leave {{Whisperback|your username}} on my talk page.
If you leave me a message, I will reply here and leave a notification your talk page.
Please indent your comments and start new sections for new conversations. Thanks!

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7

Reference to Financial management

Dear Mato, Why didn't you accept my article on financial management. I am Masters in Banking and Finance and i have written what is relevant to financial management. My points were very valid. and your definition is not relevant to the subject,i beg your pardon. but i can't change your definition only because you are the authority. This is not fair. You have made an argument that my material was little and poorly written. What about your material is it sufficient enough to describe even the theme of the subject? if you criticize on someone than be ready for their reply. I can't do anything just because

I am the User

and

You are the authority

your definition of financial management is "Financial management may refer to: Managerial finance, a branch of finance that concerns itself with the managerial significance of finance techniques. Corporate finance, a type of finance dealing with monetary decisions that business enterprises make and the tools and analysis used to make these decisions."

My reply

Hi there. Sorry to upset you by this - let me explain. Before you edited the page, it acted as a redirect to the articles Managerial finance and Corporate finance. You then appeared to decide that the term Financial management deserved an article of its own. Upon reading through your version of the article I decided (in my opinion) that Wikipedia probably didn't need an article solely on "Financial management". I based this upon a few reasons, roughly consisting of:

1. There were no references on the page

2. Information was poorly laid out and disorganised

3. The style of writing was not encyclopaedic, for example, questions were asked within the article

I therefore decided the article didn't meet Wikipedia's standards (I am often of the opinion that 'no article' is better than 'a bad article') and so decided to nominate it for deletion. Anyone can nominate an article for deletion on Wikipedia if they read the guide here and file the request correctly. I have no special privilege or 'authority' here - I am just another editor. Those who have commented so for at the articles nomination deletion have agreed that the page should remain, as it was, before you edited it. You are more than welcome to comment in the discussion, or to open a discussion on the article's talk page, giving reasons why you think the term "Financial management" deserves it's own article - you would need to make sure that the information you wish to add is unique to Wikipedia (i.e. not covered in the other finance-related articles) and can be fully backed up by external sources. I hope this explains things further - feel free to get back to me if you have further questions. Mato (talk) 22:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sofia Hayat

I understand what you are saying, but then I also uploaded an image from the same site with the same license, why was that removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.25.172 (talk) 08:08, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite right, that image was a free image, but there was no proof of its license linked by the uploader. It is the uploader's responsibility to prove the file is free. Hundreds of copyright violations are uploaded everyday and neither copyright taggers like me nor admins have the time to search each website for the license info. If proof of the free license is clearly linked by the uploader, I can assure you that I (or anyone else) will not suggest that it be speedy deleted as a copyright violation. Again, I'm here to help, I'm not here to stop people uploading anything to Wikipedia, just to make sure copyright is respected. Mato (talk) 21:56, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

image

Please can you help me put this image for the page Sofia hayat, I would really appreciate your expert help, as you have shown I am a complete novice. As you are aware this image is under the same liscence ofthe image you keep putting up, so please can you put this one up. I really appreciate it. Thankyou so much. http://www.filmitadka.in/celebrities/sofia-hayat/sofia-hayat-hot-5225.html THIS IS THE LISCENCE THAT YOU ASK FOR http://www.filmitadka.in/static/filmitadka-creative-commons-attribution-share-alike-license.html AUTHOR FILMI TADKA What do I have to do to get this on wikipedia, can you do this for me please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.158.27.6 (talk) 22:50, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am always happy to help, but upon closer inspection, I'm sorry to say the license says as follows:

All photographs from FilmiTadka http://www.filmitadka.in/page3-parties.html...are available freely under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license.

The license therefore only covers photographs in the specified link, the "Page3 Parties" album, which the image you linked is not. This image therefore appears to be non-free. Sorry. Mato (talk) 23:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

question please =)

hi :) I'm new to this signing into wikipedia and changing information. Somehow, whenever I change Scotty McCreery's and Lauren Alaina's profile just a tad, it keeps on disappearing! And then a few messages said that I'm not supposed to change their profiles or something..... i have no clue what's happening! Can you please explain? And the changes I made was saying that Scotty and lauren are Christians which is true (definately true) and that scotty goes to the First Baptist church in Garner, North Carolina. You see, know where on wikipedia says that he is a christian, and it is obvious to all the God is a part of his daily life and that God was the one that brought him this far. Please reply :) thanks so much for the help! God bless you and have a great day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22046024769264ev (talk • contribs) 14:07, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please make sure that all info on living persons' articles meets our biographies of living persons policy.Jasper Deng (talk) 17:44, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. As Jasper has said both above and on your user talk page, when editing pages about people, especially living people, it is important that all additions are supported with references, proving the claims. If you are noting that someone is a Christian, it is important to say how you know this - and your source must be reliable! I hope this explains why your edits were reverted - feel free to ask any further questions. Mato (talk) 19:22, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

thanks! Yes, I do have references in saying that because I can give links where Scotty Mccreery HIMSELF is saying that he is a Christian and why he believes, etc. But where do i write down the links?