User talk:Since 10.28.2010
 | PLEASE read every single notice below. They contain quite important information that you will need to know how to comment here, and what to and what not to do on this talk page. They also provide key information to prevent possible edit wars, arguments, and major usage of the warning templates. If you do decide to skip past some or all of these messages, keep in mind that I will assume that you have read all of these notices, so please do not get offended if I call on you for not reading them. Thank you! |
 | My time zone is currently |
| Formal notice: I usually will take great offense to some mere jokes, usually due to my lack of a sense of humor, simply having a bad day (pretty much every day), being in a recent dispute or argument with another quite fellow Wikipedian, or due to my usual angry personality. Please don't get offended, as I do actually have uncontrollable temper tantrums that are on and off throughout the day, and there is no known medicine to cure them. Also, please don't make jokes to me, especially sarcastic ones, as they will usually be quite misunderstood, and despised at. Thank you! |
| This page has deleted content. This page has previous content that has been deleted or moved. Please do not move any deleted content back here, as it will be deleted as soon as possible, and it crowds up the page. Thank you very much! Also, your comment may be deleted at any time without prior notice. Any article, even those in discussion, may be deleted at any time without prior notice. |
| This is my policy: ANY section or comment may be deleted without notice. If your comment is deemed unproductive or useless by me, it may be deleted without notice. If your comment has profanity, personal information, or inappropriate or suggestive material, images, text, etc., it may be deleted without notice. THIS IS NOT A CHAT SITE. If a conversation or comments unrelated to Wikipedia form, it may be deleted. If your comment violates any of Wikipedia's policy rules, it may be deleted. Content that remains unedited/untouched for a significant amount of time will be deleted. Any comments in the section labeled “Mentorship” that are not related to it may be removed. If there is any problem you may post a comment below to dispute it. If you have any questions about this policy you may post a comment below and ask your question. |
| Please read this before posting comments. POST ALL COMMENTS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE, OR THEY WILL BE REMOVED.
|
Since 10.28.2010 is offline
LOOK
POST ALL COMMENTS AT THE BOTTOM, OR THEY WILL BE REMOVED. Signed, An editor since 10.28.2010.
Mentorship
Blocked from editing
Since 10.28.2010, I have been your mentor for 11 days. When I took the role on, I explained to you that you were close to being indefinitely blocked, which you acknowledged. As part of the mentorship process, I've given you many suggestions of ways to improve at your adoption page, discussing them with you if you disagree. However, you have decided to stop engaging with these suggestions - asking why you should care.
I expect this is all part of a "temper tantrum", which we were discussing - I specifically stated that I would take a zero-tolerance approach to temper tantrums and you confirmed that you understood. We went on to discuss your most recent temper tantrum - where you initially refused to accept you were in the wrong. You went on to indicate that you "don't care" that you were in the wrong, you just wanted an answer.
Since this point, you have been unnecessarily confrontational on the reference desk[1][2] and at a user talk (including showing disregard for guidelines), asking questions which appear to be designed to provoke a reaction ("trolling") - how to kill the president and what are farts made of.
Due to the problems mentioned above and also a pattern of disruptive editing habits:
- Obfuscating history by refusing to archive, instead blanking sections of your talk page and including long strings of edits
- Feigning ignorance I bow to you, Lord WTT ... Three (trillion) cheers for you! followed by where exactly did I use sarcasm? four hours later as a direct reply. You had feigned ignorance in the past - prior to my mentorship (under "more concerns")
- Vast majority of article editing is updating sports scores as the game progresses - a minor violation of WP:NOTNEWS
I believe you have worn the patience of the community to the ground and my mentorship (along with Ryan Vesey's good faith) was your last chance to become a productive member of the community. I no longer believe that mentorship is a viable option and so I am summarily blocking you from editing wikipedia indefinitely. WormTT · (talk) 10:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l
lists.wikimedia.org.
Since 10.28.2010 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The questions at the reference desk were actually for a science project, the kill the president was an actual question given by my class. The “I bow to you”, that wasn't meant to be sarcastic. I actually meant that. As in “Thank you for providing me the answer”. And in the “[I] just wanted an answer”, that was before the mentorship. I just wanted the answer to my question, which I wasn't getting. I really don't see why I am getting blocked for again? Worm, please tell me why you strongly recommended, pushed so hard for an archive. I clearly stated I don't want one. No, I didn't know I was blocked on my account, and coincidentially I was editing from an IP address at the time. I didn't know that I was blocked here. I was coincidentially evading a block, I didn't know there was a block in place. Again, “I bow to you” was not meant to be sarcastic. I meant it in kindness. Updating sports scores where; as in 2011 San Francisco Giants season or 2011 FIFA U-20 World Cup? Yes, I stated I was being blunt, I thought you would see that. The first one, I was very aggravated, so I posted a reminder that I don't know the answer. The second, I don't see how it's not understandable. I thought it was a reminder to not be blunt. I didn't find it obvious. Again: the questions at the help desk, I actually wanted an answer, I wasn't trolling. I wanted to know the basic composition of flatulence. It was part of a science project. And for the president, I wanted to know the previously used strategies used to assassinate the president. I stated before the comment that it may be a disputable subject. Again, I wasn't trolling, or at least I wasn't intentionally trolling. How exactly did I show disregard at StuRat? I said, to be blunt. And I have been contributing to Wikipedia, in numerous areas. (I will show you if requested.) This was probably a waste of your time. Look, my temper tantrum has greatly affected Wikipedia, but I shall contribute to Wikipedia from then on, will remove all notices and archive, exactly as you said. I know if I say “Give me a chance”, you'll say “You already got one”, so I am choosing my words carefully.
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The questions at the reference desk were actually for a science project, the kill the president was an actual question given by my class. The “I bow to you”, that wasn't meant to be sarcastic. I actually meant that. As in “Thank you for providing me the answer”. And in the “[I] just wanted an answer”, that was before the mentorship. I just wanted the answer to my question, which I wasn't getting. I really don't see why I am getting blocked for again? Worm, please tell me why you strongly recommended, pushed so hard for an archive. I clearly stated I don't want one. No, I didn't know I was blocked on my account, and coincidentially I was editing from an IP address at the time. I didn't know that I was blocked here. I was coincidentially evading a block, I didn't know there was a block in place. Again, “I bow to you” was not meant to be sarcastic. I meant it in kindness. Updating sports scores where; as in [[2011 San Francisco Giants season]] or [[2011 FIFA U-20 World Cup]]? Yes, I stated I was being blunt, I thought you would see that. The first one, I was very aggravated, so I posted a reminder that I don't know the answer. The second, I don't see how it's not understandable. I thought it was a reminder to not be blunt. I didn't find it obvious. Again: the questions at the help desk, I actually wanted an answer, I wasn't trolling. I wanted to know the basic composition of flatulence. It was part of a science project. And for the president, I wanted to know the previously used strategies used to assassinate the president. I stated before the comment that it may be a disputable subject. Again, I wasn't trolling, or at least I wasn't intentionally trolling. How exactly did I show disregard at StuRat? I said, to be blunt. And I have been contributing to Wikipedia, in numerous areas. (I will show you if requested.) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASince_10.28.2010&action=historysubmit&diff=440217877&oldid=440216158 This] was probably a waste of your time. Look, my temper tantrum has greatly affected Wikipedia, but I shall contribute to Wikipedia from then on, will remove all notices and archive, exactly as you said. I know if I say “Give me a chance”, you'll say “You already got one”, so I am choosing my words carefully. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=The questions at the reference desk were actually for a science project, the kill the president was an actual question given by my class. The “I bow to you”, that wasn't meant to be sarcastic. I actually meant that. As in “Thank you for providing me the answer”. And in the “[I] just wanted an answer”, that was before the mentorship. I just wanted the answer to my question, which I wasn't getting. I really don't see why I am getting blocked for again? Worm, please tell me why you strongly recommended, pushed so hard for an archive. I clearly stated I don't want one. No, I didn't know I was blocked on my account, and coincidentially I was editing from an IP address at the time. I didn't know that I was blocked here. I was coincidentially evading a block, I didn't know there was a block in place. Again, “I bow to you” was not meant to be sarcastic. I meant it in kindness. Updating sports scores where; as in [[2011 San Francisco Giants season]] or [[2011 FIFA U-20 World Cup]]? Yes, I stated I was being blunt, I thought you would see that. The first one, I was very aggravated, so I posted a reminder that I don't know the answer. The second, I don't see how it's not understandable. I thought it was a reminder to not be blunt. I didn't find it obvious. Again: the questions at the help desk, I actually wanted an answer, I wasn't trolling. I wanted to know the basic composition of flatulence. It was part of a science project. And for the president, I wanted to know the previously used strategies used to assassinate the president. I stated before the comment that it may be a disputable subject. Again, I wasn't trolling, or at least I wasn't intentionally trolling. How exactly did I show disregard at StuRat? I said, to be blunt. And I have been contributing to Wikipedia, in numerous areas. (I will show you if requested.) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASince_10.28.2010&action=historysubmit&diff=440217877&oldid=440216158 This] was probably a waste of your time. Look, my temper tantrum has greatly affected Wikipedia, but I shall contribute to Wikipedia from then on, will remove all notices and archive, exactly as you said. I know if I say “Give me a chance”, you'll say “You already got one”, so I am choosing my words carefully. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=The questions at the reference desk were actually for a science project, the kill the president was an actual question given by my class. The “I bow to you”, that wasn't meant to be sarcastic. I actually meant that. As in “Thank you for providing me the answer”. And in the “[I] just wanted an answer”, that was before the mentorship. I just wanted the answer to my question, which I wasn't getting. I really don't see why I am getting blocked for again? Worm, please tell me why you strongly recommended, pushed so hard for an archive. I clearly stated I don't want one. No, I didn't know I was blocked on my account, and coincidentially I was editing from an IP address at the time. I didn't know that I was blocked here. I was coincidentially evading a block, I didn't know there was a block in place. Again, “I bow to you” was not meant to be sarcastic. I meant it in kindness. Updating sports scores where; as in [[2011 San Francisco Giants season]] or [[2011 FIFA U-20 World Cup]]? Yes, I stated I was being blunt, I thought you would see that. The first one, I was very aggravated, so I posted a reminder that I don't know the answer. The second, I don't see how it's not understandable. I thought it was a reminder to not be blunt. I didn't find it obvious. Again: the questions at the help desk, I actually wanted an answer, I wasn't trolling. I wanted to know the basic composition of flatulence. It was part of a science project. And for the president, I wanted to know the previously used strategies used to assassinate the president. I stated before the comment that it may be a disputable subject. Again, I wasn't trolling, or at least I wasn't intentionally trolling. How exactly did I show disregard at StuRat? I said, to be blunt. And I have been contributing to Wikipedia, in numerous areas. (I will show you if requested.) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASince_10.28.2010&action=historysubmit&diff=440217877&oldid=440216158 This] was probably a waste of your time. Look, my temper tantrum has greatly affected Wikipedia, but I shall contribute to Wikipedia from then on, will remove all notices and archive, exactly as you said. I know if I say “Give me a chance”, you'll say “You already got one”, so I am choosing my words carefully. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}