Jump to content

Talk:Mid-Atlantic gap

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 98.252.65.65 (talk) at 07:28, 12 August 2011 (Neutral POV?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Merge

In re merge, please comment here. For what it might look like, have a peek at this, WIP. TREKphiler hit me ♠ 14:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral POV?

This appears very much to be written from a British point of view. How did Germany, or or the United States, or the Soviet Union, view the Mid-Atlantic Gap? The issue of submarines vs. merchant convoys in the Atlantic is extremely important to WWII. Beyond the glaring use of only a British perspective, I don't think the article gives due importance to the actions, consequences, perceptions, and planning of the other major players in the North Atlantic, nor to the issue of merchant shipping as a whole. It is as though a former British officer describes what happened from his perspective, without considering that other nations were involved and had their own perspectives, or that WWII was a complex global event rather than solely an assault on the UK.