Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-03-24 From Genesis to Revelation
| Wikipedia Mediation Cabal | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Article | From Genesis to Revelation |
| Status | closed |
| Request date | Unknown |
| Requesting party | Robotman1974 22:29, 24 March 2007 (UTC) |
| Parties involved | BGC |
| Mediator(s) | RJASE1 |
| Comment | The requestor in this case has left Wikipedia. There has been no objection to closing the case. |
[[Category:Wikipedia Medcab closed cases|From Genesis to Revelation]][[Category:Wikipedia medcab maintenance|From Genesis to Revelation]]
Request Information
[edit]Who are the involved parties?
[edit]Editors in dispute are User:Robotman1974 and User:BGC. Robotman1974 22:29, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
What's going on?
[edit]This dispute is over whether or not a recent CD reissue of the album with an extra disc of material should be included in the article with its own track listing. A third opinion and a request for comment have only gotten two other opinions, as can be seen at Talk:From Genesis to Revelation. Robotman1974 22:29, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
What would you like to change about that?
[edit]More input from editors is needed to show a definite consensus either way. Hopefully a clear consensus will settle the issue. Robotman1974 22:29, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Mediator response
[edit]OK, have heard back from both parties and have been reading up on the dispute and the applicable guidelines. So far as I can determine, the primary fact in dispute is about whether a particular re-release of this album, with additional material, is notable enough for inclusion of this release's additional track listing in the article - have I got it right? If there are any other points to your case, please make me aware of them, thanks. Also, would you like to discuss the issue here, on the article's talk page, or somewhere else? RJASE1 Talk 15:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- As far as I see the issue, that's a complete description. The discussion might as well take place here, but I have no objection to it being on the article's talk page either. Robotman1974 17:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Since this is sort of a black-or-white issue without much room for a compromise solution (either the track listing is included or it's not), I think a good step to start with is to get some more opinions to try to reach consensus. For now, I relisted the RfC, and additionally I solicited some more opinions for the RfC at at Wikiproject Albums. Hopefully some additional input will be helpful in forming consensus. RJASE1 Talk 18:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
It looks like one of the parties in the dispute has decided to leave Wikipedia. This case can probably be closed as a result. RJASE1 Talk 03:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Compromise offers
[edit]This section is for listing and discussing compromise offers.