Jump to content

User talk:Colincbn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Colincbn (talk | contribs) at 14:48, 10 October 2011 (→‎Warning: r). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Tree shaping

It seems you have asked me a question. To insure that there can be no misunderstanding down the line will you please edit your comment to add my name if that is in fact the case. I'm finished for today but I will answer you in the next day or so. Thanks Blackash have a chat 09:41, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would you check my English, please?

Colincbnさん、はじめまして！ 私は、主に日本語版Wikipediaで活動してますDamena (talk)です。Colincbnさんは、ja-5のUserということなので、日本語で書きます。

私は、Colincbnさんに相談したいことがあります。先日、私はDinosaur brains and intelligenceというarticleで、#Sapient dinosaursというsectionをつくりました。しかし、私のEnglishは完全ではありません。私が書いたsentencesには、grammatical mistakesがあるかもしれません。そこで私は、日本語とEnglishの両方をつかえる人にcheckをお願いしたいと考えました。私はWikipedia:Local Embassyを探し、Colincbnさんをみつけました。Colincbnさんは、correction可能ですか？--Damena (talk) 08:01, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

はじめまして！はい、もちろんいいですよ。僕はそんなに恐竜には詳しくないので科学的の所はチェックできませんが英語は問題ないです。いまは遅いので明日の朝編集させて頂きます。Colincbn (talk) 16:48, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
出来ました。Colincbn (talk) 08:42, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Colincbnさんが校正していただいたことを確認いたしました[1]。大変きめ細やかなチェックに感謝いたします。私の説明不足が何点かありましたので、補足いたします。
  1. "Toyota (豊田有恒), a Japanese science fiction writer and graduate from..." としていただきましたが、豊田氏は慶應大学医学部を中退していますので、より適切な表現に修正していただければ助かります。
  2. 豊田氏の著書、(a)『過去の翳』（かこのかげり） 、(b)『続・時間砲計画』、(c)『ダイノサウルス作戦』は、少なくとも私の知る限り、英語訳はされていないようです。それぞれ私が勝手に、(a)"A shadow of the past", (b)"Prospectus　for the spatiotemporal　cannon part 2", (c)"The plan of dinosaurus"と英語のタイトルを考えました。このうち、(c)に関しては、Colincbnさんが"The plan of the dinosaurs"と修正していただきましたが、残る(a)と(b)に関しても、より適当な英語のタイトルがあれば、ぜひとも改善をお願いします。
  3. cite bookとして挙げた、(d)『本当にいた不思議な生き物 : 人類と動物の祖先たち』[2]、(e)『新恐竜伝説： 最古恐竜エオラプトルから恐竜人類まで、恐竜学の最先端』[3]も、英語のタイトルがありません。これらに関してもそれぞれ、(d)"Unaccountable creatures that really existed: The ancestors of human and other animals"、(e)"New dinasaur book: The front-lines of dinosaurology, from Eoraptor as the earliest dinosaur to Sapient dinosaurs"、と便宜的に英語の訳を付記しましたが、もっとわかりやすい文法ミスなどがあれば、重ねてチェックをお願いいたします。
以上、よろしくお願いいたします。特にチェックしていただきたい個所は<u></u>のように下線をほどこしています。--Damena (talk) 11:28, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Colincbn, this comment was unacceptable.[4] Accordingly, here is a formal warning about the potential of discretionary sanctions:

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Tree shaping. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tree shaping#Final decision section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page.

Please try to moderate your own behavior so that sanctions are not necessary. Thanks, --Elonka 01:07, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Colincbn no matter what you think of me. I have the right to add citation needed,if you want to remove it,replace it with a reliable ref.?oygul (talk) 12:55, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Colincbn, you have been reverting at Richard Reames,[5][6] including removing requests for citations, and you have not been engaging in discussion at the respective talkpage. All of these actions are considered disruptive. I do understand that there is already a primary source on that sentence, but primary sources are only acceptable in cases where the information is not challenged. See also WP:SELFPUB. As soon as there is a valid challenge, the sourcing requirements go up, so you should try and find a reliable third-party source to verify the information. If a third-party source cannot be found, the challenged information can be removed from the article. I am also very concerned that you have reverted the article twice, but I have seen no attempt by you to engage in discussion at the article's talkpage. In the future, as soon as one of your edits is challenged, especially in the contentious "Tree shaping" topic area, it is very important that you explain your actions at the talkpage. This is the best way to proceed, to try and maintain a harmonious editing environment. Thanks, --Elonka 02:04, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is hard to maintain a ""harmonious editing environment" when sockpuppets and malefactors are given respect while those of us here to do good work are repeatedly slapped in the face. Colincbn (talk) 14:40, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also I did not "revert twice" and not reply when "one of my edits were challenged". I edited two seperate things that were changed by an editor with a personal grudge against the subject of a BLP and then did not re-revert either of those edits again. You need to chill out and stop harassing good editors with this baseless power-mongering. Colincbn (talk) 14:48, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Colincbn&oldid=454878529"