Jump to content

User talk:71.246.147.40

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 71.246.147.40 (talk) at 03:00, 16 October 2011 (→‎Talk:North Carolina Highway 181: OK). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Keep on

with your analysis—you're convincing me. I think it would be very useful for the FAC noms to have some kind of easy visual indication of how many page views the article gets. (p.s., I promise not to bring any low-hit mushroom articles to FAC for a while... your South Park analysis was on the mark—even though I had to dig around to figure out what the hell you were talking about). Sasata (talk) 08:27, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You were incorrect to reassess that article for WP:USRD as you did. The project assigns Stub, Start and C/B based on a metric involving how many of the "big three" sections (route description, history, junction/exit list) are present, and since all three are there, it's a C. To be bumped to a B, that's when citation density is considered. BTW, TCO, per WP:Courtesy vanishing, "Vanished users have no right to return under a new identity or as an IP." Please have your old account recreated and use it. Imzadi 1979  02:40, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to put what you want on the rating. Just stepping back and looking at it, regardless your rules, I disagree (because the sourcing is so light and poor). On the user name, let's not fight. I will leave your road articles alone.71.246.147.40 (talk) 02:48, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As for the account, you aren't following policy. You vanished, but came back. You need to do the right thing, or re-vanish and stay gone. Imzadi 1979  02:59, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I heard you. Please no more orange bars. You are probably right, but at this point are repeating a criticism. Peace...71.246.147.40 (talk) 03:00, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]