Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PornstarGlobal

PornstarGlobal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Its references are trivial and any coverage fails WP:CORP because AVN and XBIZ are of limited interest and circulation. Article was also created by an SPA, likely an employee of a company that has a history of spamming wikipedia.[1][2] Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:16, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:26, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a non-notable company. Source are nil, fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 06:10, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This Adult entity is very well known, reputable, and many references are available to anyone online, I simply didn't have the time to complete the entire Article. I'm not sure why Morbidthoughts insists that I am an Employee? I'm fairly sure an Actual Wikipedia Admin advised him to stop singling out this particular issue some months ago. I know music, and I know porn, that's all I can tell you. A couple random editors don't like the PornStarGlobal site from some things that made them mad in the past, but I can't help that, nor does it change the facts [3]. I didn't even post the link to the site itself, and this article has been thriving for months. Morbidthoughts is making my contributions feel unwelcomed, and I advise that his obvious obsession with this particular issue be looked into. Solidcontrib (talk) 05:15, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]