Talk:Bloody Knife/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk · contribs) 20:28, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
- No disamb links
- All external links check ok
- The ISBN for Donovan, James (2008). A Terrible Glory: Custer and The Little Bighorn needs checking
I fixed the ISBN mistake. RG (talk) 20:45, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- More in line citations are required - the first sentence has two then the rest of the paragraph only has one at the end. There are several statements in the paragraph that should be cited.
- Which statements are you refering to? Basically everything in the rest of that paragraph is in covered in that lone source at the end. RG (talk) 05:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- The same with the second paragraph, there are four citations two thirds of the way in and its not clear what cite is for what fact. I can add cn tags if that would help
- Yes, the cn tags would be very helpful. RG (talk) 05:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- First paragraph of the First years as a scout section could use more in line citations
- The cn tags might be useful here as well. RG (talk) 05:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- It needs a good copy edit can I suggest you post a request here Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
- I've sent in a request. RG (talk) 05:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
On hold
I will put the review on hold until after the copy edit. Jim Sweeney (talk) 17:28, 2 December 2011 (UTC)