User:Qwyrxian/SPI draft

Space for IP editor to provide evidence in support of an SPI.

Part of this information could be used also for proof of POV. I will report some user edits and maybe Lisi's off-wiki material.

To ease the process let me link some important pages: Special:Contributions/SherryNugil - Special:Contributions/Scientryst - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=An_Exceptionally_Simple_Theory_of_Everything&action=history (what is the internal link for a revision history page??) - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antony_Garrett_Lisi&action=history

I believe that users Scientryst and user SherryNugil are the same person. I believe that user SherryNugil is a sock puppet of Scientryst and the reason is that xe wants to hide the fact that they both are WP:SPAs, and in a tiny broader sense them, as a couple of users, are also a SPA. In fact, they only edit, respectively, the above mentioned pages about Lisi's E8 stuff and Lisi's personal page.

Their style in editing, in reverting, in supporting Lisi's position, and responding in discussions is absolutely identical. A quick check should be enough without needing to ask for a WP:CheckUser.

Some examples:

First appearance in summer 2008 (I will see if there was any previous puppet or IP involved too). It's a chronology of Lisi. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=An_Exceptionally_Simple_Theory_of_Everything&action=historysubmit&diff=219654212&oldid=219165984 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antony_Garrett_Lisi&action=historysubmit&diff=223182199&oldid=206773351

This is one case where I spent time explaining things to user SherryNugil, but I wouldn't have wasted time, and the discussion would have gone much better and quicker if it was obvious that it was the same user as Scientryst. SherryNugil in the discussion page says: <<2) The full sentence is "On June 9, 2007, Lisi realized that the algebraic structure he had constructed to unify the standard model of particle physics with general relativity matched part of the algebraic structure of the E8 Lie group." Is this not correct as written?>> I had explained the same things to Scientryst and I wasted my time with a user that was just reverting my changes and responding to complaints with questions. In addition, it wasn't up to me to show that something is written correctly. It is up to the editor to show that something is correct when editing. In the specific, no, the sentence wasn't correct. It's mathematically agreed even by Lisi. The user SherryNugil was playing with words, a typical technique used by Scientryst, and trying to hide the fact that it's not the standard model to be matching part of E8 in his construction, but it's part of the standard model to be matching part of E8 in his construction. The difference being that a theory of everything cannot have part of the standard model matching a theory. The whole standard model needs to be hidden. User SherryNugil was hiding this to make Lisi's model look more appealing. And I wasted a lot of time writing answers to SheeryNugil, answers that I had previously discussed several times with Scientryst. The result of this is that the suckpuppet was a way to make more difficult the interaction and the changes for the page. As for today, the page still misses the word "part of the standard model".