Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
Appearance
Rollback
- Arunsingh16 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions)
- Reason for requesting rollback AKS (talk) 09:06, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Not done due to lack of vandal-fighting experience. Furthermore, edits such as the one you reverted here are not vandalism. Please familiarise yourself with WP:NOTVAND. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Dear Salvio, thanks for your time. I will place a request after some weeks for rollback. However, I must draw your attention about changes made on page Rahul Gandhi. We can term it as "Edit warring" or also vandal. If you check the history of that page, that particular section has been touched several times and will effect neutrality of the article. It is upto personal judgement if the same can be classified as vandalism or not. Thanks AKS (talk) 13:19, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- With edits like the report you just made to AIV, this is unlikely to be done in even several weeks time. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Reaper - Yup, I realized that moment after I was "done" with the "war of words" with someone and ended up doing something that I should not have done. In anycase this is good learning for me. CheersAKS (talk) 17:06, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- With edits like the report you just made to AIV, this is unlikely to be done in even several weeks time. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Dear Salvio, thanks for your time. I will place a request after some weeks for rollback. However, I must draw your attention about changes made on page Rahul Gandhi. We can term it as "Edit warring" or also vandal. If you check the history of that page, that particular section has been touched several times and will effect neutrality of the article. It is upto personal judgement if the same can be classified as vandalism or not. Thanks AKS (talk) 13:19, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Not done due to lack of vandal-fighting experience. Furthermore, edits such as the one you reverted here are not vandalism. Please familiarise yourself with WP:NOTVAND. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Jargon777 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions)
- Reason for requesting rollback I wish to use Huggle to help combat vandalism, this requires rollback rights. Jargon777 Talk 13:58, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done An optimist on the run! 17:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
- Aj3953 · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions)
- we often find people boosting articles... i would like to request this right to help articles remain neutral... Aj3953 (talk) 10:19, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- Not done - this is not what rollback is for. See WP:ROLLBACK and WP:NOTVAND. An optimist on the run! 10:53, 5 January 2012 (UTC)