Editing of this talk page by unregistered users is not allowed because choosing to edit without logging into an account creates a power imbalance in communication. All such edits will be reverted without comment.
Unless you have a static IP, you are purposely preventing other editors from observing patterns in your editing behavior as well as purposely choosing not to have a permanent place where other editors may reliably communicate with you about those behaviors. If you are allowed to make this choice, then I choose to rectify this imbalance by ignoring you.
If you truly wish to communicate as equals, please create an account and become an established editor. Thank you.
Oh the irony
You helped close a discussion about closing discussions. I know from your earlier comments and actions that you won't understand how bad that is. I can move on. I just hope that one day you and others like you with such closed perspectives can too. Good luck to you. I genuinely wish you well. HiLo48 (talk) 05:59, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I meant to thank you for this edit [1]. I'd missed that. I don't see BLP problems but an IP removed the material again and brought it to WP:BLPN. I think the IP and the main editor involved don't understand our policies here, eg the edit summary "Even if such nonsense should really be mentioned in a "book" published by Oxford University Press, it would rather appear appropriate to protest against such a publication than to quote it on Wikipedia." If you think there are BLP issues please chime in at BLPN. Dougweller (talk) 08:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(+)
