This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
This is a Wikipediauser talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Brewcrewer.
I noticed you are doing some good cleanup work on Mount of Olives. What do you think of moving the notable burials to a separate list? At this point the rabbis, in particular, are starting to take over the page. Maybe the list should be called "List of rabbis buried on Mount of Olives."--Geewhiz (talk) 14:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have a problem with separating the list. but as at this juncture it is totally unsourced i would not be inclined to make an article or list of entirely outsourced content.--brewcrewer(yada, yada)15:33, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Your intuitions were on target the last time, so I trust your suspicions in this case are valid as well. There have been more, let's say...peculiar, new User accounts popping up in the topic area lately: Miriel2012 (talk·contribs), for example, and there were a couple others I came across, but I forget where and what they called themselves now.—Biosketch (talk) 10:00, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. I'm a "newbie" and "just getting started," and "any hints and tips would be welcome." Strange comments from a new account. Seems like the user is bending over backward to make a point to deflect suspicion. The user immediately dives into I-P, contacts a number of editors and opens "discussion" at IPcollab. he claims to have made "a hand full of pre-account edits." Seems to me that this is a classic reincarnate of a previously banned account. Problem is, I don't know if a CU would be helpful because presumably, the user would be well-acquainted with ways to circumvent technical evidence.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 15:33, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, reading BHB on his talk page, and its becoming more and more clear that he's a returned user. Can't pin him down though. Miriel12012 also had a previous account and I have my suspicions, but won't divulge it online.--brewcrewer(yada, yada)00:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh come on, people. This investigation on his talk page has a strong taste of harassing. So far BHB is not disruptive, may be it is a WP:FRESHSTART attempt or even a new user. What's the point in hunting a harmless sock (if he is a sock)? --ElComandanteChetalk00:35, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
BHB is not a new user. Impossible. The acting on his talk page is so transparent.
BHB denies FRESHSTART and that's extremely unlikely as it is. FRESHSTART is only available to editors without a history of bans or blocks and it's highly unlikely that anyone editing I-A would be interested in a a FRESHSTART but have a clean record.
In my experience these fake new editors tend to behave at the beginning, but it is not long before their previous inability to behave rises to the top.
