User talk:RA0808
Status: Offline 
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:
- Be civil.
- I am not an administrator and I cannot undelete a deleted page, please contact the deleting administrator for that.
- I may rename or consolidate sections for the sake of organization, but will never change the text of your message.
- Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
- Thus, if I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. Use the {{ping}} on your talk page or a {{talkback}} template here to remind me.
- To initiate a new conversation on this page click on this link.
- Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
- Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
- Remember to sign your comments by typing four tildes (~~~~).
GO FU CK YOUSELF YOU KNOW ME SO IAM NOT GONNA PRESENT MYSELF !!!!
Why did you remove the informational resource on Female Genital Mutilation that was put on the female genital mutilation page along with other sub campaigns that were left untouched? The wiki external links guidelines below state that it can be placed as an external link if it contains "information about the subject of the article from knowledgeable sources". There is not a more comprehensive site on information on FGM on the web that I have found than cagem.org. In fact the other two links there are regionally localized to Europe while this source contains global information. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links#What_can_normally_be_linked — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cherylbarksdale (talk • contribs) 06:42, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- I removed the external link you added because your previous edits seem to indicate that you are campaigning for CAGEM. Your previous edits were doing nothing but promoting the organization and you refused to even wait for the review of the CAGEM article you posted at AFC before repeatedly posting the link. Your edits were disruptive, hence they were reverted. RA0808 talkcontribs 06:48, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- I kept repeatedly posting the link because it was the most relevant and unbiased on the list (not just European). I felt the link was a good informational resource regardless of whether it had its own wiki page so I didn't think i needed to wait for a page. Wiki users will be very deprived to not have such a resource listed for FGM and I am asking that you repost this. As far as campaigning for CAGEM, I campaign against FGM internationally not just 1 organization. However, the general campaign encompasses all other sub-campaigns which is why I feel it should be on wiki. I consider myself to be an expert in the field and I don't think listing 1 organization that does not focus solely on FGM is appropriate considering many others that are more specific are being left out. So, could you please re-insert the external link? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cherylbarksdale (talk • contribs) 07:08, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- I reiterate, my revert had nothing to do with the QUALITY of the site you were adding. I reverted your edits because you were being disruptive (even though you were editing in good faith). RA0808 talkcontribs 14:31, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Re: Robyn Lawley
Hi,
Just wondering why you reverted the external link? I know youtube videos were looked down upon but this one was an interview from the original author. Mount1313 (talk) 06:46, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Links to user-submitted video sites like YouTube are generally avoided due to copyright violations.
- For example, the video you linked is licensed under the Standard YouTube License. This means that while it can be viewed freely on YouTube, the uploader retains all other copyright. Please see more info on Standard YouTube License here (external link to Google Help) and Wikipedia's policy on external links to YouTube. Hope this helps! RA0808 talkcontribs 06:56, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Re: Talk:Bodyguard
I can't believe that you deleted my editing about the article bodyguard I was trying tell him he had many errors that he had to fix. PLus I have freedom of speech and I follewed all of Wiki's rules and regulations. You really need to reread it wtf. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.94.104.158 (talk) 16:38, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- I deleted your edit to the article's talk page because you...
- A) ...did not add anything constructive to the debate. All you did was claim to be a secret service agent and declare it the worst article you've read.
- B) ...then went on to insult someone (I couldn't tell who, as your comments weren't directed to anyone) stating that they were "a disgrace to any bodyguard" and that they "suck".
- These edits were non-constructive, hence they were reverted. As for your claim of "freedom of speech", under the GNU Free Documentation License (which you agree to whenever you submit content to Wikipedia) you have given permission for your work to be modified. RA0808 talkcontribs 16:50, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Exactly if you did not know who I was talking to then you had no room to delete it. Just because you can control people's post doesn't mean you can delete thing on false grounds.Come on, man up! — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[Special:Contributions ([[User talk:|talk]]) 16:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Derogatory comments against other editors (specific or not) are against Wikipedia's policy regarding personal attacks (see: "Insulting or disparaging an editor is a personal attack regardless of the manner in which it is done"). If you would like to constructively suggest ways the article can be improved, you are free to do so. RA0808 talkcontribs 17:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Hallam Hope
Hello RA0808. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Hallam Hope, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: One of the reasons why A1 and A3 srticles are not supposed to be speedied in their first few minutes is that they are often expanded by the creator. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 17:12, 17 February 2012 (UTC)