Jump to content

Talk:New Girl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rurry007 (talk | contribs) at 07:13, 29 March 2012 (→‎"Critics" section: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconTelevision Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

(The?) New Girl

Every promotional material is referreing to this TV show as "New Girl". Why has this article been called "The New Girl"? Slasher-fun (talk) 20:13, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was announced as The New Girl (see the references), but it's currently on Fox's website as New Girl (working title). I'll move it for now, title may still change though, but we can move it again if that's the case. Xeworlebi (talk) 20:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which is it?

Is it Jake Johnson or Jake M. Johnson? Cleo20 (talk) 15:28, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation

can someone explain why coach returns from somewhere if he was already there in the pilot episode? it's really confusing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.163.214.58 (talk) 20:42, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's less confusing if you notice that it is two different black guys. Both in term of character and actors. :rolleyes: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.8.171.79 (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Single-camera?

This show is not single-camera. not sure how to change the infobox.Moss Ryder (talk) 02:33, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Fixed. HiLo48 (talk) 04:31, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Critics" section

The critics section has a lot of grammar issues and also doesn't really cite its sources...