Talk:Bloomberg
Appearance
![]() | Disambiguation | |||
|
Redirect
I think this should be moved to the television station with a dism. call at the top saying the other options. the TV network is by fara nd away today's most important (glboally) "Bloomberg" name (why its buried under here i dont know either)Lihaas (talk) 11:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
- I think I disagree with you on that one. If anything, it should redirect to the parent, Bloomberg L.P.. I would say that Bloomberg Terminal represents an equally significant product to television, and NewsWeek's circulation is certainly non-trivial. I'd back a redirect to Bloomberg L.P., though. ℱorƬheℒoveofℬacon ✉ • ✍ 07:06, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
"Anglicized from..."
The statement "Anglicized from Yiddish or German: Blumberg" makes it look like "Blumberg" is the anglicized form. The colon should not be there. Unfortunately the colon comes from a lang-de tag, which I am loath to remove in case it serves some valuable purpose. Could someone fix this, please? — Paul G (talk) 16:08, 28 March 2012 (UTC)