User talk:Bananastalktome

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thanks for your contributions, Bananastalktome. SwisterTwister talk 02:16, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

I had administered a third warning to the user(s) shortly ago. I had noticed that you had administered a second warning. You should have administered a fourth warning, as that is the current level that the user(s) deserves after their/his/her edits. Thanks. 76.254.122.124 (talk) 02:45, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would have, however I decided to indicate a failure to properly cite material instead of indicating vandalism, since I am unclear with the particular subject of the article and decided to assume good faith in this matter (since, for all I know, this could have been a legitimate claim). - Bananastalktome 02:50, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Reasonable statement, however, in my opinion, if there is a bad faith pattern taking place, it likely indicates that the edit was made in bad faith, and, therefore, a final warning should still be administered, based on my experience, however, on the other hand, it could have been a different user at that IP address. I still believe that it pays to give a final warning since it appears that there is a pattern of vandalism by at least one user of that IP address. Note that {{Shared IP advice}} states that one should create an account to avoid warnings intended for other users. Given this information, it pays to administer a final warning, and, if any innocent users are affected, they may follow that advice and create an account. Thanks. 76.254.122.124 (talk) 03:00, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]