User talk:AndrewN
If I have left a message on your talk page, please reply there. I watch any talk pages I post on, and will reply there.
Prefer Email? Click Here.
|
If you need specific assistance with an issue in your article, don't hesitate to ask, but with work and school, responses may take several days. |
User Danny
Hey, I am only commenting because the user is using aspbergrs as a excuse i have aspberger it does nto cause you to be the way there describing, it makes people who like me have it seem like a different type of person, add to that i truly want to help them--Andrewcrawford (talk - contrib) 21:22, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- Bwilkins has blocked you for 12 hours for personal attacks. AndrewN talk 21:23, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks.
OK, thanks for the response on the Abuse report. Thanks for replying. Next time in the future, I will check the whole websites trying to find the email addresses. --Damirgraffiti |☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 00:53, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar | |
For your response on the abuse report, along with helping me, I would like to give you this barnstar. Damirgraffiti |☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 00:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC) |
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Brother Andrew good day! You are not a muslim, why you're editing page on Islam?
will be glad to hear from you soon!
Majilis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Majilis (talk • contribs) 02:50, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
- Greetings Majilis, may peace be with you! Thank you for contacting me in regards to my reversion of your content addition on Islam. You are correct in assuming that I am not a Muslim, however, please understand that I have the utmost respect for any person's religious belief, be it Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, or which ever religion a person decides to follow, regardless of my personal beliefs. With this being said, I hope you will understand that I meant no harm or offense in reverting your edit.
- In using one of many anti-vandalism tools, Huggle, I came across your edit. The addition of the HTML comment in your edit (the <!-- comment -->) in regards to photography of humans being against Islamic practice was against standards. Adding comments like this isn't truly a standard of practice here on Wikipedia. While your statement seems accurate (from my rather limited knowledge of Islam), it's not the kind of thing that would be placed in a comment like that, and as such, I reverted the edit as unconstructive.
- I strongly encourage you to discuss the removal of that image on the article's talk page. However, please do not remove or comment out images as you did. I think it would be a fairly reasonable assumption that if your statement is true, it may have already been discussed. An edit like this could be considered controversial, and as such, it should be discussed with the community on the article's talk page.
- It appears you have only joined Wikipedia within the last 2-3 weeks, so I understand you not having known about this. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask. I hope you will become a productive member of the Wikipedia community! As you can see, I have posted a welcome message with tons of different resources on your talk page. I hope this will serve useful to you as you become an active part of the community. Once again, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask! Have a wonderful day. AndrewN talk 04:19, 23 May 2012 (UTC)