User talk:Eaglestorm
This is Eaglestorm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
![]() | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Your edit summary
This type of edit summary is certainly not welcomed at Wikipedia. --SMS Talk 14:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- Certainly not, especially since you did, in fact, violate WP:3RR. Calling a fellow editor a troll and edit warring would usually be grounds for a block, especially since you've been both warned and blocked for similar things in the past. I'm not blocking you for now, just don't do it again, m'kay? henrik•talk 14:44, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- His actions already indicate trolling and disruption to the project. Looking at other Metal Gear pages, this is not the first time that particular banned editor with almost the same IP tangled with me, especially when that guy's edit summary language is more or less, the same. A rangeblock of the 68.XXX.X.XXX IP is much better. --Eaglestorm (talk) 15:35, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- Blocking almost 17 million IP addresses to get one person seems a bit excessive, but let me know if he persists and I can semi-protect the article. Anyway, 1) it was User:Smsarmad you called a troll in the edit summary, and 2) the fact that someone else is misbehaving isn't an excuse. henrik•talk 16:34, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- You can easily identify the errant IP sock by the language they use, and I was not referring to SMSarmad as the troll in that summary - it was that IP sock. Call that Fragments-of-Jade-sock-in-denial anything you may, but when people like him try to fix something that ain't broken and goes around telling people to f off I'm-not-this-and-that, not to mention going after the admins undoing their changes, you know he's not gonna contribute anything. Banned means banned, as Sjones23 said in a recent edit. That IP sock is one of many others I've encountered in my years of editing (including one I've relished putting on the SPI page), and quite frankly, most of them if not all are just big [censored due to NPA]. --Eaglestorm (talk) 17:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- Blocking almost 17 million IP addresses to get one person seems a bit excessive, but let me know if he persists and I can semi-protect the article. Anyway, 1) it was User:Smsarmad you called a troll in the edit summary, and 2) the fact that someone else is misbehaving isn't an excuse. henrik•talk 16:34, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
Philippine WikiCon
You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
- I appreciate the invitation, but I will not make myself a target for people who turn out to be editors I've butted heads in the past couple of years since Manila 5 - especially edit warriors who messed with me. Thanks anyway. --Eaglestorm (talk) 11:28, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
"The Magician's Code"
I put in an RFP because I didn't know when the page would be fully fleshed out. Now that the plot has been expanded, hopefully the page will stabilise. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 02:49, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Good Crazy edit war
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Please don't revert content without providing any valid reasons. "shorter doesnt matter" does not mean anything. The continuity reference is completely valid, taking it out to make a section one line smaller is not a valid reason to remove it. Looking through the page history, you've reverted similarly phrased comments over and over again. Please refrain from reverting, or I will have to call in an admin over the issue. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 03:50, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- If you check the edit history for the page, you will see that a persistent vandal with a myriad of IP addresses (and a few one-time-only-use registered names) has been re-adding this bit of info for the last two weeks. But the claim is original research. It cannot be added without a valid source to back it up. 99.192.75.44 (talk) 03:52, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- I just referenced it, see my new edit. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 03:56, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- Also, everything in the continuity section is technically OR then, since nothing there is referenced. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 03:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- I am staying away from the page for awhile, but I am going to inform an admin about your behavior. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 04:04, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- You don't seem to understand what counts as a source. All of the other items are sourced by the episodes. All we know from this episode is that Marshal is smoking and that his child (of indeterminate gender) is about to be born. It is an assumption that (1) this is his son and (2) that he won't have another cigarette before the child is born, even if it is a son. That we see him smoking does not tell us that it is the last. The episode does not source the claim. 99.192.75.44 (talk) 04:05, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- If you watched today's season finale, you would know it is a boy, Marvin Wait-for-it Erickson. Nonetheless, I am still referring you to an admin. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 04:10, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- Now all you need to do is explain how you know he did not have another cigarette between the one he had in ""Good Crazy" and when the boy was born. It is only an assumption that he didn't. 99.192.75.44 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:13, 15 May 2012 (UTC).
- If you watched today's season finale, you would know it is a boy, Marvin Wait-for-it Erickson. Nonetheless, I am still referring you to an admin. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 04:10, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- You don't seem to understand what counts as a source. All of the other items are sourced by the episodes. All we know from this episode is that Marshal is smoking and that his child (of indeterminate gender) is about to be born. It is an assumption that (1) this is his son and (2) that he won't have another cigarette before the child is born, even if it is a son. That we see him smoking does not tell us that it is the last. The episode does not source the claim. 99.192.75.44 (talk) 04:05, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hey Greyanomalywhatever, you don't seem to understand the thrust of those revisions...and blogging about it doesn't help. It's even bizarre why you had to bring it to my talk page when you could have brought it up at the article's discussion page. Now that I think of it, I will post everything there.--Eaglestorm (talk) 07:10, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Benigno Aquino III
Maybe also see Wikipedia:External links 49.145.85.9 (talk) 08:10, 3 June 2012 (UTC)