Jump to content

Talk:Five Ks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GS(v) (talk | contribs) at 13:25, 6 June 2012 (→‎Appropriately neutral?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconSikhism Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Sikhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Sikhism. Please participate by editing the article, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconIndia Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article was last assessed in May 2012.

Appropriately neutral?

The statement that "One who is neither following rules nor keeping all five Ks can not be called a Sikh." seems likely to be supported by extremely observant Sikhs and equally profoundly disputed by less observant Sikhs. Particularly problematic on a page with no references.

A more appropriate statement might be eg "Some sources consider that...", with relevant references.

Even better: "Some sources consider that..., while others dispute this.", with relevant references for both views.