User talk:Manway


Wikipedia ads	file info – #182

Archives

Index 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by .

Anuj Tikku

Hi. Thank you for patrolling new pages. However, whether you like the 'article' or not (I don't either) 2 minutes is too fast for A1 - as you are aware. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:08, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Priestblock

Either ADD TO IT or LEAVE IT Please.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priestblock_25487:_A_Memoir_of_Dachau_:_Fr._Jean_Bernard

Context provided, references provided, Fair Use per Title 17 U.S.C — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christopheroriger (talk • contribs) 05:02, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christopheroriger — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christopheroriger (talk • contribs) 04:57, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you have the wrong idea about Wikipedia. It's not for stories. It's not for writing a book. Think more Encyclopedia Britannica. Your entry would not be accepted there. It's not appropriate for here. See WP:FIRST for some ideas of what I'm talking about. Regards, --Man way 05:35, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. It is you with the Wrong idea. The Catholic Church Exists, the Holocaust happened. Do you deny the Holocaust and the Catholic Church? Because of you do, you probably should not be editing pages here. Cheers. Christopher Origer 05:49, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Christopher, I have reviewed the deleted article and can confirm that it was correctly deleted each time by due process. The link you placed at Jean Origer has also been removed. Please guard your comments to other users. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:46, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Wang Haibo (Football Manager)

Hello Manway. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Wang Haibo (Football Manager) to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:04, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi^{t | c} 17:23, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Manway. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 21:31, 11 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

???

Content does NOT automatically need to be sourced if it is true. Sources are a secondary thing that should be added later and are not my problem. I just want to add the content itself. Moreover, I did NOT actually add content to the Tara Strong page. I merely deleted an objectionable template that was trying to enforce the false notion that sources are required on all pages. ResonX (talk) 02:13, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wanna organize your user page?

Wanna organize your user page? I can show you how. Tonymax469 (talk) 04:04, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]