Wikipedia:Editor review/Basalisk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TheAnnoymousUser (talk | contribs) at 20:10, 28 July 2012 (→‎Basalisk*). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Basalisk*

Basalisk (talk · contribs · count) I've been around for about 9 months and thought I'd get a bit of feedback on how I'm doing. Please be honest and constructive with your criticism! Basalisk inspect damageberate 09:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

  1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
    I mainly work on new page patrol, cleaning up new articles and nominating speedy deletion candidates, and in AfDs. I also perform gnomish tasks and do a bit of copyediting. I don't create much content as I don't consider it to be my forte, but I have created one or two articles such as Elective (medical), and have done a lot of work on others such as Eva Rausing.
  2. Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
    I have been in a few content disputes in the past and I am passionate about my editing. I think I'm always civil in discussion, even when frustrated. Over time I think I've become better at staying cool in disputes, and I think I have learned when it's best simply not to reply to goading and to walk away from a debate to allow it to reach a conclusion without further input from myself.


Reviews

  1. Please Be more careful with your speedy delete tags, remeber the difference between speedy and Xfd.TheAnnoymousUser (talk) 20:10, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]