User talk:Porterjoh

Complaining

If you actually bothered to look at the content I removed, you would have realised that it was repeated twice in the same section. 120.149.0.172 (talk) 00:56, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

I dont think BMTH is deathcore at all. They sound llike Post-rock, avnt-garde experimental metalcore to me. real deathcore is Job for a cowboy, sepultura, suicicide silence, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.249.51.219 (talk) 16:10, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Josh Griffith

sorry for disrupting your writing i hope you forgive me. Porterjoh, I'm sorry if I gave you extra work to do. Mr. Griffith ducked out and kept working while thousands of writers were on picket lines, forgoing their income on principle. He is not deserving of respect or civility. However, I do understand that you have standards to uphold and again, I'm sorry if I made more work for you. Jim Houghton 76.174.95.65 (talk) 01:35, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Point Noted

Will Do :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.97.209.139 (talk) 18:02, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

David Belle edit

The phrase "well known" is not accurate in this sense, and there is significant and active debate as to David's role in the creation of the movement. In fact, claiming that he is "well known as the founder" is considerably less neutral than presenting both sides (i.e., "claimed by some"). While these pages obviously may not be bastions of neutrality, the opposing side's arguments can be visible here:

http://takeflightsucks.com/

http://www.flipyeahparkour.com/2012/04/goodbye-parkour-com-hello-parkour-com/

I have re-reverted the page and will stand by the edit. If you have an issue with the phrasing, I can certainly modify it, but the core content of my edit is accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.166.218.55 (talk) 08:15, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy nomination

Hi. Not sure if you have this page on your watchlist, but I wanted to let you know that I revoked your speedy deletion nomination of Do Good Real Estate. I think 'became the first company in Wilmington to be labeled a Benefit Corporation' is sufficient to bypass the A7 criterion. Of course, notability is largely irrelevant in that assessment, so I have no prejudice if you want to take it to PROD or AfD. I find from a NPP perspective that it's best to let these articles exist if there is any chance of inclusion. Have a good one. NTox · talk 20:44, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

NTox · talk 20:50, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: G.H. Hopkins Elementary School

Hello Porterjoh, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of G.H. Hopkins Elementary School, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to schools. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 22:18, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: X Factor Indonesia (season 1)

Hello Porterjoh, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of X Factor Indonesia (season 1), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: CSD A7 doesn't apply to TV shows. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 22:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Re:SSG-69 article

Sure, no problem. I was posting a source for some of the material on that article (regarding Russia's use of the SSG), then realized the link I discovered was for the much more modern SSG-4 and was not an official source - merely a blogger invited on a press tour in the Russian army. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexkvaskov (talk • contribs) 00:13, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

about nationalities and regions of Spain

Hello, I would like you to respect the editions that are not spam or vandalism, cos I edited that page and now I see that a robot of yours (or something) has automatically reverted my edition. I don't sign with a english user cos I am catalan user and don't have an account in the english wikipedia, but I'm a serious person. And about the edition itself, I would tell you that the sentence "In practical terms, the majority of the population, including nationalists, are largely satisfied with the current status quo even if there are still aspirations for further recognition of their distinctiveness or for the expansion of their self-government" is totally untrue, and if you know something about catalans and basques (and maybe galicians) you will now that is untrue, cos the main feeling in Catalonia is that we are not very confortable (politically) being part of Spain. That being said, it doesn't means that we all want the independence, but what "the majority of the population" want for sure is a new political relation with the spanish government and the rest of regions, I have heard that even within the spanish origine population in Catalonia, so: how can you say that we are satisfied with the current status quo?? Don't you pretend that those 2 sources know better than us what do we want, do you?? I hope you respect the editions, or at least you edit the original sentence in a way that explains a little better the real situation (maybe my english is not good enough), cos otherwise everybody will think that we are happy with the way things are now, and we have so many trouble making us understand in front of the rest of the world. Thank you for your comprension. 188.79.225.67 (talk) 23:55, 1 September 2012 (UTC)