User talk:Donfarberman

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia.

Please note that:

(a) You should not delete other's postings from talk pages. [1]

(b) Articles are based on published reliable sources - not on contributor's opinion's [2],[3],[4]

(c) Only non-controversial edits should be marked as minor.

AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:28, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:46, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent deletion of article talk page discussion

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 76.248.149.47 (talk) 00:00, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody can 'close' a discussion by selectively deleting comments they don't like or disagree with. 76.248.149.47 (talk) 00:00, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did I inspire you to join Wikipedia?

I noticed that all of your contributions have been on two articles that I have been criticising. Perhaps you jumped into the talk pages, saw my contributions, and decided to make an account? There have already been attempts (some successful) to silence me on Wikipedia. Why? Because I unapologetically point out blatant dishonesty in articles that are spun to advance a leftist narrative. Stirring the pot on Wikipedia upsets the status quo. So I am derided and slandered as a "troll", "soapboxer", or "ranter", because they cannot counter anything I've said and need to deflect from their pathetic "research" and "editing". These are the desperate attempts of dishonest Wikipedians who are committed to preserving the leftist echo chamber. After coming to Wikipedia since its inception, I've observed as it's become an increasingly dishonest source of information (due to the demographics of its "editors", of course), and I just felt compelled to make an account and levy a few criticisms. Cheers. Bobinisrael (talk) 00:23, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The majority of editors are idiots, hiding behind "rules" they make up to push their narrative. I am glad someone agrees.