User talk:Johntex/Talk08

Resid's owning of WP articles/projects

Greetings Johntex, On this page Resid is using IP addresses to falsely direct other editors to "discuss before edits" on the Fethullah_Gülen article, this is part of the same behavior that got him in trouble on Wikiethics (also his use of IP addresses to edit in ways outside of those suggested by you his mentor). Such direction is utter nonsense relative to WP:BOLD. Would you kindly request that he refrain from such IP based editing and giving such false directions? Thanks! Netscott 08:00, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trollwatcher

Johntex, Please take another look at Trollwatcher's talk page. His main point, apparently undisputed, is that the website in question had no inappropriate links on it when he posted links to it. There are lots of other interesting points made, which Musical Linguist has seen but signally chosen not to respond to. Ximines 10:30, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsensicality

Johntex, I plugged your absurdities into Google and it told me I was doing something illegal. You made me break the law! ("Bad Request. Your client has issued a malformed or illegal request.") This seems grounds for not going to this page. At all. · Ka t efan0 ^(scribble)/poll 11:47, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (2nd nomination)

You are invited to vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (2nd nomination). All this is is ramblings/blog/rants about Bush. Not encyclopedic, should've been deleted long ago. Happy editing! Morton devonshire 20:54, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review?

Hey Johntex. I was the nominator of the AfD above. I made some comments on Cyde's page regarding some of my thoughts about what happened. Personally, I feel that the decision was right, even though I personally would want the article gone, because I don't see how there will ever be consensus to delete this article. However, I was wondering specifically about the process of deletion review. I would nominate an AfD for deletion review if I felt the decision was out-of-process, and not based on how I personally feel ... Is this correct? BlueGoose 00:08, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject: Texas

This may be a wiki, but with facets such as a WikiProjects that regularly go through cycles of inactivity. A coordinator, like that exists at WikiProject US regions help to keep the projects alive. Since you have taken the annitative you may consider requesting the creation of such a postion and stand for it yourself. As the oldest active member of the project, I would have no objections to such a move on your part. -JCarriker 00:22, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am the current coordinator of WikiProject U.S. regions, there is no coordinator for WPP:TX, the position would need to be created. -JCarriker 01:26, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

* Important - Your input requested ASAP *

Please see this Wikipedia:Deletion review#Rationales_to_impeach_George_W._Bush.

Merecat 00:35, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me what you think of this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (3rd nomination).
You can leave your message on this talk page here.

Thanks, I've already provided me input on the new AfD. Johntex\^talk 07:53, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]