User talk:Steel

; Archives
	1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Click here to leave a new message

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
RfA candidate	S	O	N	S %	Status	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Report
Pickersgill-Cunliffe	200	0	0	100	Open	00:35, 15 June 2024	0 hours	no	report

ElPiloto

Can you take care of 189.241.179.214 (talk · contribs), this user admitted to be User:ElPilotoDi, and as you protected three pages against him in the past, it would be possible to block him? Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:24, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. – Steel 01:28, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the incovenience but he returned as 189.241.160.86 (talk · contribs). This guy really doesn't understand. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:49, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It turns out the /16 range is basically used only by El Piloto, so I've blocked it. At the very least it will mean two weeks of respite from this whack-a-mole with different IPs. – Steel 14:29, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Basil L. Plumley page you protected

His death has been confirmed by the media - http://www.wtvm.com/story/19785743/2012/10/10/retired-csm-basil-plumley-dies-fort-benning-mourns-loss I would appreciate you updating the page with his death as I am not a wikipedia editor/user. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.118.249.198 (talk) 18:20, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link. I have updated the page accordingly. – Steel 18:34, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Only thing you can do is to lock pages. Because you are afraid of different opinion. There is a reason why Wiki is open for editing even by unregistered users. You know why? No, seems like you don't. Weak person. Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.159.212.102 (talk) 07:46, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

12th man (football) - RFPP

Hi, re your decline of the RFPP - another bout overnight. It looks like a set of Aggies who either think the article is about the trademarked term or don't want to admit that the term was used in a similar context elsewhere. There's a couple of us have the article watchlisted but it's getting a bit monotonous :-) Semi protection would be a help but I accept it's only a slow burner. NtheP (talk) 10:14, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what an Aggie is but I've given the page a short protection. It would be good if you could drop a note on the talk page explaining your position, and the IPs can contribute to that if they so desire. – Steel 13:46, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Solid-State Drives

Thank you for your work to ensure the integrity of this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.122.28.217 (talk) 13:51, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unprotection

Hi Steel,

I had posted here earlier requesting the unprotection of the Humanitarian Coalition Wiki page. I noticed you deleted this post, but your comment was unclear. Sorry to bother, just curious. I would really like to see this page unprotected ASAP HCIntern —Preceding undated comment added 17:55, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you have some new and improved content which addresses the problems Syrthiss explained, then it would probably be best for you to paste it into the talk page where somebody who isn't associated with the Coalition can review it first. – Steel 18:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Advice Steel, I will start by including content that should be in no way be contentious. Thanks again HCIntern 14:32, 17 October 2012 (EST)