User talk:Rndomuser

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Rndomuser. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Sudo Ghost 04:31, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that was... unexpected. Thanks, I guess ;-) Hopefully the cookies are gluten-free, because those are the only kind I can eat. Rndomuser (talk) 04:37, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I only noticed afterwards that someone had already welcomed you, but I figure it never hurts to know that your contributions are noticed and appreciated. Take care! - Sudo Ghost 04:48, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at SudoGhost's talk page. - Sudo Ghost 01:22, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. You have a new message at SudoGhost's talk page. - Sudo Ghost 01:41, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. You have a new message at SudoGhost's talk page. - Sudo Ghost 05:18, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Karaim language

I see you have also discovered the weird stories which are infecting the pages related to Karaims. I had started to edit out the rubbish earlier, but Toddy1 and Warshy work in a team to revert edits which are not to their liking. They seem to enjoy stalking too so it is not necessarily a good idea to get into an edit war with them. Nevertheless, if you want to look at the changes they reverted earlier [1] you will see I already tried to remove the source you removed. Anyway, nice one! :) Kaz 21:41, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review of AfD that you participated in

As you participated a few days ago in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flat Bastion Road, I thought you might wish to know that the result of that discussion (to keep the article) is being challenged in a deletion review. If you have any views on this (i.e. whether to endorse the result, overturn it or something else) then please feel free to comment at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 October 2. Prioryman (talk) 22:03, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meh... "Delete", then "Keep", then "Overturn of Keep" (which also doesn't seem to go as "planned" by a certain person, so there will be EVEN MOAR nonsense "reviews/previews/overviews")... I've expressed my opinion on this subject once, not gonna mess with this nonsense and a petty in-fighting between senior editors again. I mean, look at that fucking nonsense that the main "personal interest pusher" posts in this "deletion review": "So far, we have 8 "endorses" and 4 "vacate and redo" opinions. Seems pretty clear cut, BUT of the 8 "endorses", 6 were by people who commented in the original AfD as well, so who just basically want to keep their desired result. Of the fresh, independent voices (which is what the decision in a review should be based upon)..." - why the fuck bother if certain people like me "are not welcomed"??? Rndomuser (talk) 08:23, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links

A dead, unarchived source URL may still be useful. Please read Wikipedia:Dead_links. But thanks for finding a new link that works.--Toddy1 (talk) 18:57, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I apologize for using an improper description in my "edit summary". Still, though, if you see someone removing a reference with "dead link" you should try and recover the information from the dead reference yourself instead of simply reverting that person's edits ;-) Rndomuser (talk) 23:41, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Just wanted to let you know I've responded on my talk page. - SudoKamma (Sudo Ghost's Away Account) 04:13, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

to your respond

Exigen soft seems to me very likely a company founded in russia http://www.russoft.org/directory/?profile=23 (Exigen Services Profile, RUSSOFT, June 26, 2007) this was the first link and the guy who founded it is a russian. The same goes for Quic my link showed that it was very likely that the company was founded where one of the founder stayed home, the article was specified for russian companies founded in russia. The korean rocket luncher is seriously very old, it cant even be called a rocket luncher.

the pic of the article states that the ammunition arent rockets but singjeon which do have their own article.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singijeon

It uses arrows not rockets. So can i at least remove this?--Shokioto22 (talk) 06:30, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]