Jump to content

User talk:E8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yxiao2424 (talk | contribs) at 14:59, 8 November 2012 (Why?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Penguin CabalThe Penguin Cabal
The Penguin Cabal
Welcome to my talk page!
Please post new messages at the bottom of this page, and title and sign your posts appropriately. Also, please keep your posts concise and to the point, as I may and will decline to read verbose and/or rambling requests.

Biodiesel

I apologize for the inconvenience caused by the article. I will have the edits removed right now. The account is not being handled by me. Smarojit (talk) 15:41, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The content is still there. If your account is compromised, see here.--E8 (talk) 15:44, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am trying to revert all the edits made by a friend of mine, using my account. Apologies once again. Smarojit (talk) 15:47, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the 3RRR tag; thanks for reading the Talk and entry log.--E8 (talk) 15:48, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply (sodium hydroxide IUPAC name)

I have answered to your reply on talk:sodium hydroxide. It was actually a spelling mistake from my part.Vanischenu mTalk 12:13, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkpage

Fair enough. But maybe you can answer the question I posed. Why is it OK to use an author's conjecture on some articles but not on others? The correlation is 1:1 between the source used in the Tax Wikipedia article and the one used in the CBPP article. Could you please tell me how to communicate this clearly to someone with a partisan agenda without "protesting" it by engaging in a tendentious dispute in another article? 173.79.6.215 (talk) 18:16, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

I have mentioned the copy in the edit summary, plus, I have put a note on the talk page of both source page and destinate page. Why is it still invalid? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yxiao2424 (talkcontribs) 23:45, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]