Talk:2012 New Mexico Bowl/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Buggie111 (talk · contribs) 18:30, 1 January 2013 (UTC) Nice to see either the Sun Devils or Wildcats do something good every once in a while...
- Firstly, I see that Refs 12 and 13 are the same (cite the same website). You fix this by using <ref name=rivals>Reference goes here...</ref> for the first instance and <ref name=rivals/> afterwards.
- Well, #12 is the offensive statistics subpage and #13 is the defense...
- It's all that "apple cider". Any way to modify the title so that it shows the difference? Buggie111 (talk) 19:19, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Well, #12 is the offensive statistics subpage and #13 is the defense...
- comma after first instance of "wildcats"
- Done
- there only seems to be one ref in the lead. I think the MO here is ref all of it or none, but not 33% of it.
- I agree, however this ref was included because it's the only instance within the article where it's mentioned that this is the first bowl...I thought it was worthy of being cited, but there was nowhere else to do so.
- Possibly the "Pre-game statistics" section? Buggie111 (talk) 19:19, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- I agree, however this ref was included because it's the only instance within the article where it's mentioned that this is the first bowl...I thought it was worthy of being cited, but there was nowhere else to do so.
- Second lead para might need some numbers for total offense, not just rushing yards.
- "In the fourth quarter, Arizona was able to cut the lead to 45-35 on a 63-yard touchdown pass from Scott to Austin Hill. " could be "Arizona was able to cut the lead to 45-35 on a 63-yard touchdown pass from Scott to Austin Hill soon after the 4th quarter started. "
- Cough, cough. Buggie111 (talk) 22:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Don't mock me! I have a cold right now! Not Funny! . I fixed that one; I just forgot to post something here. Go Phightins! 01:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Cough, cough. Buggie111 (talk) 22:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Don't know about whether or not to keep the stats table. 2011 Orange Bowl seems to list the stats in a more comfortable format.
- Are you talking player stats? I thought a sortable table might make it easier to read than prose...thoughts? Go Phightins! 18:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Me too, but I'm wondering about the remainder of the community and what they'd think. I'm fine either way. Buggie111 (talk) 19:18, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Are you talking player stats? I thought a sortable table might make it easier to read than prose...thoughts? Go Phightins! 18:52, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
All for now. Two weeks, good luck. Buggie111 (talk) 18:30, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Pass. Buggie111 (talk) 00:39, 3 January 2013 (UTC)