User talk:Pudgenet

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Since the last blatant warning I posted to your talk page, you've done this, (inappropriate reversion and accusations), this (arguably a simple continuation of an edit war, but given your recent history of blatant vandalism and the accusation in the edit summary, I think it's relevant), and made a "hey asshole" comment here. You've wrongly accused me of vandalism in the summaries of two of those edits. In Wikipedians with articles, the guidelines are simple and I consider your removal of an entry there to be more than a content dispute. I don't think any of these latest edits as blatant as the first for which you were warned, the are still arguably blatant.

Considering that even the first blatent vandalism may have been enough to get you blocked (the rules here aren't so clear), I'm adding you to the alert section of that page. I'd understand if the administrators give you another chance, but I'm not willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, so it's up to them what to do about this. -Barry- 22:06, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revert warring

I'm writing to both of you (-Barry- and Pudgenet) to tone down the nature of your edits against each other. There is nothing good that will come of this. Further, the revert warring that has recently happened between you two on Perl must stop. While neither of you have explicitly violated WP:3RR, revert warring is not permitted and is a thoroughly unsatisfactory method for achieving consensus on content of an article. Vandalism, whether as a joke or serious, is also not tolerated. Also, nobody may ban another user from editing a given article without WP:ARBCOM's approval. Lastly, the personal attacks need to stop. Work together, not apart. I will be monitoring both of you for the time being to ensure this behavior ends. --Durin 22:25, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]