User talk:Cyberia3

File:Alfred Drayton.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Alfred Drayton.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:52, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have given all necessary and possible information about this image (and others) from a 75 year old Film star magazine from a long defunct title. It had photos and very short biographies. No other information. Even the bots on this site are wreckers.(Cyberia3 (talk) 18:26, 3 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]

June 2013

Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Unite Against Fascism for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. — Richard BB 10:03, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Cyberia3. You have new messages at Richard BB's talk page.
Message added 10:56, 24 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— Richard BB 10:56, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources...again

I see that you have decided to return to editing. As has been explained and requested of you before please ensure you include reliable sources when adding content to articles. The additions you made to June Whitfield were not supported by citations and appear to be your own knowledge/research. These basic policies have not changed in the one year break you took from editing. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 17:28, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I gave up before because of the sheer vandalism of the moderator wreckers here who seem to hate the wikipedia. In the article I added to, I gave the title of the BBC radio programme I used for the information, which came from June Whitfield's own mouth. But you have removed it all proving once again that you are a wrecker.

"These basic policies have not changed in the one year break you took from editing." You mean you are still wrecking articles? I can see that for myself. I do not need a wrecker to boast about it.

Maybe you should stick to Japanese cartoons?(Cyberia3 (talk) 15:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]

"I saw it on a radio program" is original research. It would certainly be helpful if you would actually read the links that have been provided to you repeatedly so that you could start to understand why you keep having the same issues regarding your edits being reverted. There are no "moderator wreckers", just admins who are vetted and trusted by the editing community to uphold the policies and guidelines that have been determined by consensus. If you do not agree with the community's consensus then start a discussion on the relevant policy or guidelines page to see if there is support to change it. Ignoring the requirements for editing here won't bring about the changes you desire and will ultimately lead to your account being blocked.--Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 19:46, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Cyberia3. You have new messages at Richard BB's talk page.
Message added 15:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

— Richard BB 15:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Hope not Hate, you may be blocked from editing. — Richard BB 16:41, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You mean I should just let you and other moderators wreck my work and say nothing about it. Sorry God for daring to question your infalibility (Cyberia3 (talk) 06:57, 26 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]