User talk:Beerest355

Archcaster

Please leave their talk page alone. They have a right to remove your comments. I understand your frustration, but insisting on restoring your comments doesn't help. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:31, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question. :)

Hi, I saw that youre the first editor who noticed my article to be somewhat irrelevant or duplicated and now its deleted. I have a question for you, now that I have somewhat finished writing most of the article do you think it is sufficient? the article I'm talking about was the Ram Revilla Murder Case. And the somewhat finished article is on my sandbox. Thanks a lot for your help. Take care, Beerest355. Fearjesus (talk) 15:34, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 That was fast, thank you. I'd probably wait for the administrator who deleted it. Fearjesus (talk) 15:54, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bearest, I have deleted the AfC and also the sandbox under BLP policy. They apply not just in article space but anywhere in WP. The victim is notable enough to have an article, and does, but that does not excuse including names of people merely under suspicion. The proposed article on the murder is devoted to speculations about the murder, including the names of people arrested, and then released. They are devoted to speculations about the murder, including the names of people arrested, and then released. DGG ( talk ) 03:25, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Split of Virtual Boy hardware

Hi there, I noticed you proposed and then removed the proposal for SD for Virtual Boy hardware. Hopefully it's clear now that I duplicated (via copy-paste) the information from the main article, with the intentions of cutting down the main article considerably. I have done some of that and continue to do so. Please let me know if you have any further concerns. CaseyPenk (talk) 19:27, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Get That Man, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Humphries (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ram Revilla

Greetings, fellow Wikipedia Editor. Hi, it seems that you've placed the article I'm watching (Ram Revilla) on several tags: {{cleanup-reorganize}}, {{essay-like}}, {{incoherent}}, {{overly detailed}} and {{recentism}} tags (within {{multiple issues}}), and {{rough translation}} . With all due respect to your decision of impeding those tags, I would like to clarify that I am updating the article occasionally with properly sourced information. I just don't understand why you have to tag it as [incoherent and it is a rough translation]- I'm aware that some words in the article are not English however I believe I added the translation afterwards. For the recentism, I've just read that page and as a matter of fact it is not an issue somehow, as I've said I'm updating it occasionally so other detailed information would be somehow manipulated and deleted with most recent happeningso on the subject. I find the essay-like and overly detailed as the same, I just don't find anything wrong with it. The lengthy part of the article dictates the murder of the subject, which is really detailed. I am hoping you would revise or delete those recent tags you've placed, I am ok with the cleanup tag. With much respect to you, take care. MrAchilles : msg 16:23, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]