User talk:Rcade

Early Web History

Howdy, pardner. I thought you might be interested in (or at least willing to be aware of) this new project: [Wikipedia:WikiProject Early Web History] I and a few others are starting. It got started because there have been an increasing number of calls for the deletion of articles on earlyish web sites (like, say, Seanbaby or Mirsky's Worst of the Web) that were once notable but lately kind of falling off the collective mental map, and it occurred to us that it might be time to document some of the early web days. If you can think of early sites that are worth documenting (right now we're defining "early" as pre-Netscape IPO (1995)) or any good sources on those days, that would be great. Stop by if the mood takes you. Hope things are going well for you otherwise. · rodii · 01:30, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Rcade! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 249 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Susan Mernit - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Lawrence (publisher), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chantilly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kathy Sierra

The article Kathy Sierra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Is the person really wiki notable, apart from the trolling incident - in which case, ought not the incident be the article?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mpjmcevoy (talk) 12:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]