Jump to content

Wikipedia:Training/For students/Training feedback

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Editurregui (talk | contribs) at 05:14, 28 August 2013 (→‎~~~: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

You can leave a message here to let us know what you thought of the training.

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

--Jlah4911 (talk) 09:44, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

--Meltedpudding (talk) 11:28, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I liked

...it is a good method to collect information from others

What I didn't like

...the editing is a little complex, such as bold

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

--Invisible cake (talk) 11:31, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I liked

... Easy to understand.

What I didn't like

... N/A

What was missing

... Didn't think anything was missing

What was unnecessary

... Nothing. --Chelseatheademan (talk) 15:27, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

Was not concise

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

--Jajava (talk) 22:43, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

--Jeremy.stojakovich (talk) 22:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

--Jeremy.stojakovich (talk) 22:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I liked

...I really liked that you could click on the video's to watch an editing tool be used.

What I didn't like

...Since I am completely new to this, the orientation was A LOT of information all at once to take in - but obviously it had to be done that way.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

--Marikaeb (talk) 22:58, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I liked

...I liked the fact you had video with your training.

What I didn't like

...It feeling like a huge amount of information to take in all at once.

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

--Jodplink (talk) 02:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I liked
Extremely helpful and succinct. I am now looking forward to editing an article. 



What was missing

I think more scenarios of editors starting the process to the finish.

What I liked
I really liked the screencast format, it makes it easy to follow along and see exactly what to do. Great job!

...

What I didn't like
It may be good to have a tutorial that you walk through with certain goals spelled out, like make certain words bold and add 3 links before moving on to the next page.

...

What was missing
more detail on how to create different sections and the proper way to space out paragraphs.

...

What was unnecessary
All of it was good!

...

--Loured36 (talk) 21:18, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I liked

...lengthy discussion on how to edit and the helpful videos

What I didn't like

...not much interactive

What was missing

... interactive material

What was unnecessary

...

--Paullittle1979 (talk) 02:18, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I liked

...

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

...

What was unnecessary

...

--Paullittle1979 (talk) 02:19, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I liked

...It was very informative of how to do edits and maneuver while in sandbox.

What I didn't like

... The orientation was kind of long, but still helpful. --

What was missing

... There could have been more videos.

What was unnecessary

...

--Meganjeanne1 (talk) 21:08, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I liked

The guide was easy to follow and understand.

What I didn't like

...

What was missing

The walkthrough could be more interactive.

What was unnecessary

...

--IndigoDeberry (talk) 23:52, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BenDobler (talk)Orientation was great!

What I liked

...Very informative! I really got to know how Wikipedia works and how to navigate around. Was also helpful in discussing what and how to post.

What I didn't like

...Too much information too quickly! I'll have to review it later when I'm thinking of posting an article :).

What was missing

...Nothing I can think of now, but I'll be sure to let you know if I think of anything later!

What was unnecessary

...Some of the supplementary videos.

--BenDobler (talk) 17:39, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I liked
The videos

...

What I didn't like
Nothing stands out

...

What was missing
Nothing

...

What was unnecessary
Nothing

...

--ToothFairyJenny (talk) 02:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I liked

... it was short and easy to follow

What I didn't like

... the skit about plagiarism

What was missing

... nothing

What was unnecessary

... the skit about plagiarism everyone knows not to do it just say it --Theseus001 (talk) 03:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I liked

...basic and straight forward

What I didn't like

...nothing

What was missing

...nothing

What was unnecessary

...nothing

--Editurregui (talk) 05:14, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]