Jump to content

User talk:2.102.187.12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2.102.187.12 (talk) at 17:01, 11 September 2013. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

fortu== September 2013 ==

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Effeminacy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. By constantly reverting edits on this page you have violated wikipedias 3RR rule (see WP:3RR) and are at risk of turning edits on this article into an edit war. KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 16:29, 11 September 2013 (UTC) KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 16:29, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Hello, I'm Kirachinmoku. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Effeminacy, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 16:45, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you missed my edit summary? I feel that it's constructive for those reasons. 2.102.187.12 (talk) 16:50, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately you're in violation of the 3 revert rule. This rule is put in place to avoid edit wars and your constant reversions along with those of other wikipedians is rapidly turning the article into an edit war. My edit is simply in an attempt to avoid this. If someone reverts your edit in good faith and you think they are wrong please don't just undo what they have done, take the time to talk the matter over with them and you should come to a mutual decision on the matter. KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 16:56, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I was at 3 reverts so haven't quite violated it. The editor that I am having a dispute with is following me around, coming up with spurious reasons to revert so I didn't go to talk. Although I did revert one other editor, she misinterpreted my edits and consequently reverted because she thought I was blocked but we had a discussion and she apologised. Thus, it's only the one editor and I'm at 2 reverts if you don't count the other person's mistaken revert. 2.102.187.12 (talk) 17:01, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]