Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Efficient Mail Submission and Delivery

Efficient Mail Submission and Delivery

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Internet protocol that just didn't make it, with an article only echoing the IESG note in its RFC that describes why it isn't suitable for the Internet. A GScholar search turns up a slew of documents, almost all written by M. Banan (the RFC's author) with practically only self-citations. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:13, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I tried searching Google scholar for papers that referred to this RFC and were not written by Banan [1] but did not turn up the substantial coverage in multiple sources needed to pass WP:GNG. Google books also failed to find any good sources. We don't, and shouldn't, cover all RFCs (let alone with separate articles) and I just don't see the case for notability for this one. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:27, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per David Eppstein. -- 101.119.14.175 (talk) 21:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]