Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 November 19

<Hello, I recently had a discussion with an administrator about the deletion of the page Carol Kicinski. Mark Arsten was the person I spoke with and he suggested I file a request for undeletion. I was able to find more sources for the article and would like to add them to the page to improve the article. The page was deleted because of notability, but I have since found additional sources that can help prove notability. Please let me know if you need additional information from me or how to proceed with the request for undeletion. Thank you.>--M.Renae (talk) 13:51, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you list the new sources here for us, please?—S Marshall T/C 18:39, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the new sources I'd like to add to the existing sources: http://www.oregonlive.com/foodday/index.ssf/2011/07/with_a_nut_crust_mascarpone_be.html
http://tbo.com/dining/dunedin-author-offers-recipes-for-gluten-free-goodies-243413
http://www.northjersey.com/food_dining/051811_In_Your_Kitchen_Salted_Peanut_Caramel_Brownies.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/05/dining/gluten-free-dishes-become-a-lot-more-tempting.html?_r=0
http://eastvillage.thelocal.nytimes.com/2011/04/29/a-guide-to-gluten-free-eating/
http://dunedin.patch.com/groups/around-town/p/dunedin-womans-cookbook-features-gluten-free-desserts

Thanks, --M.Renae (talk) 20:59, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

temporarily restored for discussion at Deletion Review DGG ( talk ) 21:23, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Relist Looking at the AfD discussion, the nomination and the only delete !vote were made before the article was substantially improved by User:Green Cardamom and the orig. editor. It would have helped if the people who improved it had commented at the AfD. I'll comment about notability at the subsequent AfD--this is not the place to decide it . DGG ( talk ) 21:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Relist per improvements made to article subsequent to deletion arguments and additional sources presented. Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:23, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Too much promotion, not enough independent notability. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:30, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't AfD.—S Marshall T/C 12:00, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll go with relist, those sources are substantial enough to be worth considering at the proper place (which is AfD).—S Marshall T/C 12:00, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi everyone, thank you for putting this up for consideration. Is the article temporarily open again? I couldn't tell by the discussion if it is already open somewhere so I can go in and make changes or if that is still in debate. I appreciate all your input on this and would also appreciate any help in the edits so that this article can stay on wikipedia. Please let me know what the next steps are for this. Thanks, --M.Renae (talk) 13:46, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]