Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Ray (3rd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 71.82.209.86 (talk) at 09:40, 22 January 2014 (→‎Charlie Ray). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Charlie Ray

Charlie Ray (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

3rd nomination for this article (1st=Keep, 2nd=Redirect to Little Manhattan).

Since the last nomination (and thus, the resulting decision) are close to a year old, I figured it would make sense to re-evaluate the situation as the previous decision is being "overturned" by an editor.

Non-notable actress. Article fails WP:GNG, sources given are all primary sources.

I recommend reinstating the redirect to Little Manhattan or deleting the page all together. ~ twsx | talkcont | ~ 09:29, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ~ twsx | talkcont | ~ 09:37, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend KEEPING the page. She is an actress who is notable, having acted in film, television, then film again as recent as 2013. Redirecting her Wikipedia page to a film that contains no information on her is ridiculous. Prior AfD stated that original page should be reinstated if she became "notable". She is classified as an actress, has appeared in multiple mediums, and is represented by an agent. It doesn't get much more "notable" than that. I think Twsx is confusing "notable" with "famous". She has an offical facebook page, official twitter (which states "I do movies"), and most obviously, a page on IMDB stating that she is an active actress available for movies.71.82.209.86 (talk) 09:36, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]