User talk:Yopie

Thanks Yopie

Hi, I am Guilatshalit, and I wanna say Thank you Yopie for your comments, I hope to improve my articles and keep on editing wikipedia, thanks for your advice , now I will preview my articles before I edit , thank you so much.

czech prime ministers

I have another source that podivinsky is member of kdu-csl http://kducsl.cz/getmedia/966f7a80-58e6-4095-a70a-cc889e1435a0/KDU-CSL---KL-PSP2013-MSL.pdf.aspx note that candidate number 8 is clearly marked as independent.

Might wish to take a look at this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudeten_Germans Very badly written article with several POV statements supporting Nazi propaganda against Czech state. --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 16:51, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zvětšený text== Sir == Why did you revert the part about the Knights of Rizal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.166.2.105 (talk) 07:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because honorific title "Sir" is used only for British citizen dubbed by the UK monarch.--Yopie (talk) 00:18, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is not true. I can see you are not an expert so I will not discuss the matter with you any further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.166.2.105 (talk) 23:17, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- Dear anon, if you have any reliable source, that Knights of Rizal can use, by law or ancient custom, title Sir, will be great, if you share this. --Yopie (talk) 00:17, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well referenced?

No coverage other than newspapers and nothing since 1993. Rubbish article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.168.42.163 (talk) 22:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Newspaper is usually reliable source and 1993 is OK. It is your POV.--Yopie (talk) 02:15, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Esztergom

Hello! Can you please take a look at Esztergom article?. What do you think about this [1] text? 79.117.160.20 (talk) 12:21, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The vilatte orders.

I am a French contributor to the French Wiki.

This article is a shame. It is citing only Roman catholics or far-right French references. The San Luigi Abbey could be suing Wiki as there are some kind of diffamation.

--SpartakusFreeMann (talk) 21:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why do not you answer and revert my changes ?

Hi,

I didn't make any act of vandalism on the page. You revetted to diffamous version of the page.

Where can I raise this issue with a moderator?