User talk:76.126.140.150

Do you honestly believe what you are spreading?

Fine. I won't revert you again today. The next time Jimbo reverts or hats your shit, I will be on board to revert again. Keep fighting the useless fight, troll. --Onorem (talk) 02:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

It doesn't matter. If you do not revert me, another Wikipedian will, but I see you are incapable of keeping your own word, which is not surprising.

I am not a troll. Asking for the arbbom transparency, and for reducing the length of bans to a limited time is not trolling. It calls appealing for a common sense and for sanity. Your reaction demonstrates that Wikipedia are missing on both, and yes I am absolutely honestly believe in what I am saying, and could prove I am right.76.126.140.150 (talk) 02:12, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Worse than a troll. A person so disgusting that they would take advantage of the sorrow of a young person's death to try to advance their own sick agenda. That is disgusting behaviour and beyond belief. You should be asking forgiveness from Jimbo for even daring to post on his page, given the horrible behaviour you have exhibited. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 02:21, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

If you're calling my appeal for kindness and understanding "a sick agenda" you're even sicker than I thought you are. 91% believe suicides should be discussed openly. So your cronnie worm that turned and you are in minority, and I am not surprised. Both your cronnie and you are bullies. When I emailed to that worm that a bullied 13-years old kid wrote here on Wikipedia he felt as killing himself the worm responded that the kid was playing game. What a sicko!

And now please go away. As I've told you on a few occasions I would not have used you as a brush to clean a public toilet because you are too dirty even for that,and and it is noted by others too, including Jimbo 76.126.140.150 (talk) 02:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

---