User talk:Onorem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Moved from userpage (Reelkandi)[edit]

Onorem, please specify which bits are nor suitable and do you have suggestions yourself in helping in getting the point of interest across — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andisuper (talkcontribs)

It sounded like a promotional piece written for the organization and you clearly have a conflict of interest on the topic. --Onorem (talk) 15:36, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

not sure how to use all of this, but can you advise, help on this, as the instructions are complex..and have tried several edits without success— Preceding unsigned comment added by Andisuper (talkcontribs)

In general, you just shouldn't write the article. If people without a conflict of interest think it's notable, they'll write it. I have absolutely no interest in the topic. --Onorem (talk) 15:53, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Moved from userpage (Greico)[edit]

Are you serious. This is a valid source as it comes directly from richard grieco himself. Check out his art website maybe you would actually learn something about art. I welcome talking to you further about this if you would like.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chuy33 (talkcontribs)

How hard is it to find my talk page? Seriously. Three times today I had to request my userpage be deleted...
Anyway. You clearly aren't reading anything that people are telling you. Your edits are simply not acceptable. They are not neutral in their point of view, and they are copy and paste copyright violations. Enjoy your block. --Onorem (talk) 23:16, 5 October 2013 (UTC)


who are you i never said anything to you and i was kidding i know the dude.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathgenious989 (talkcontribs)

I'm Onorem. I don't care. I don't care. I don't care. Please sign your posts. --Onorem (talk) 01:07, 9 October 2013 (UTC)


Mathgenious989 (talk · contribs) has been reported to wp:aiv, and probably will be blocked shortly. Dan653 (talk) 01:07, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Not surprised. Unless there is a BLP violation or personal attack on someone other than myself, please do not remove comments left here by other users. --Onorem (talk) 01:08, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello,Mathgenious989 here. I was looking at some of my old contributions to see how far i have come. I would like to ask a question though since i found your page while looking at my wall. While I do not appreacite the talking behind my back and subseqent calling out of me i will ignore these ignorent actions . i would like to ask how to become an administrator of the site. (Mathgenious989 (talk) 23:09, 11 November 2013 (UTC))


Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Plasmic Physics (talk) 02:50, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

I still want an explanation. What you've given is shit. --Onorem (talk) 03:15, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Don't curse at people who are polite to you, you common little rude boy. CC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk)
Go away troll. --Onorem (talk) 09:17, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm like Walmart. everything is on rollback. Fuck you all. Rollback, rollback, rollback. My opinion doesn't matter. I'm a troll. Fuck it.[edit]



Hello,Mathgenious989 here. I was looking at some of my old contributions to see how far i have come. I would like to ask a question though since i found your page while looking at my wall. While I do not appreacite the talking behind my back and subseqent calling out of me i will ignore these ignorent actions . i would like to ask how to become an administrator of the site (Mathgenious989 (talk) 23:11, 11 November 2013 (UTC))

Don't worry about becoming an admin. Try to be a good editor. Listen to feedback. The admin thing will work itself out (or not) after at least a year of just editing. Side note: I wasn't talking behind your back. It was all out in the open if you were looking, and there was nothing ignorant about 'those' actions. --Onorem (talk) 05:37, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Your comment to me[edit]

"Stop evading your block?" Other than allow myself to be kicked around by some bully with a block button and give up my years-long hobby, I feel I don't really have another option. Colton Cosmic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk)

Go away. You weren't bullied away. You tried to force YOUR opinion over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and finally someone decided to tell you to shut up and go away. You weren't trying to work with the community. You were trying to tell everyone else why they were wrong and you were right. Go away. Get the fuck off my page. You are not welcome here. --Onorem (talk) 08:47, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Don't curse at me, you common little rude boy. You commented to me first. Follow your own advice about "go away." You have no idea what you are talking about, Onorem. I always tried to work with the community. You are sheer ignorance. CC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk)
Go away troll. If you didn't do things like this, you might have people here who would be willing to listen. --Onorem (talk) 09:18, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Again, follow your own advice. You don't want me to talk back, then don't talk to me. Your "troll" attack shows how low meaningless noise your conversation is. Bye. CC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk)
You aren't teaching me shit, other than that you are too fucking stupid to realize that you ruin your chances even more of being taken seriously every time you respond. Wait, I already knew that so I guess we're back to you aren't teaching me shit. I'll have the last word on my own talk page. You might come back with another IP, but I'll respond to that one if I have to. You don't get the last word. You lost the right to speak on this entire project already. I won't give you the right to have the final word on my page. --Onorem (talk) 09:27, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Random other moron[edit]

You go away you loser. Way to standup for you boyfriend Blueboy96. Make me go away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueboysucks (talkcontribs)

I can't make you...but I hope you enjoy and accept your block. Thanks for stopping by. --Onorem (talk) 16:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Your swearing and personal attacks towards me doesn't put you in a very good position either, especially since I didn't initially start arguing with you. Why are you in this anyways. What does me and hangingcurve/blueboy96 have anything to do with you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueboysucks (talkcontribs)

I don't need to be in a good position when dealing with an obvious troll. What the fuck do you think I'm risking by being rude to someone like you? I have no idea why his talkpage was on my watchlist. For all I know, it's because I've had an argument with him in the past...but when I see worthless pieces of shit like you trolling, I bite. You succeeded with your trolling. Good job. Enjoy the block that is clearly coming soon. --Onorem (talk) 17:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

you suck[edit]

You suck Onorem. You keep standing up for your boyfriends on Wikipedia, and get so rattled when other people get insulted, and swear at people with works like "fuck" even when they didn't initially attack you. I bet you cry to your mom whenever someone gets insulted in Wikipedia, but not nearly as much as you are now since this time you are directly the one being insulted. Onoremsucks (talk) 17:09, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm not rattled, and I seriously couldn't ever be offended by anything that you have to say. --Onorem (talk) 17:22, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

You seriously suck giant cock Onorem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk)

I'm not that flexible...but thanks for stopping by. --Onorem (talk) 02:26, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
I just stumbled on this, this altercation is hilarious. It has made my day. Sorry if this is innapropriate. Mbcap (talk) 02:12, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
I'm fine with it. Made me laugh to read it again. I'd forgotten about it. --Onorem (talk) 02:21, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
It does make me a little sad to see how little action my page has these days. I haven't had to archive in how long... --Onorem (talk) 02:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
This is probably also innapropriate, but I think both this and "Random other moron" brightened my day up. It's really blatant personal attacks, but not violent ones, but so stupid they make me laugh. (talk) 22:08, 22 February 2016 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Onorem. You have new messages at ColinFine's talk page.
Message added 16:58, 6 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ColinFine (talk) 16:58, 6 December 2013 (UTC)


Why did you remove the information on Jeffrey Dahmer's grandmother Catherine?. And your "And?", sounds arrogant. There's no worse in a human being than being arrogant. --Japanesehelper (talk) 19:41, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

The And? means...why should that information be in his article. What does it have to do with the Aftermath? --Onorem (talk) 20:23, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Sad Report[edit]

Thank you for your comment. Not sure why I was reported. If having a dynamic IP is a crime, then I'm guilty as charged. (talk) 02:28, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

I don't entirely AGF about you myself, but it's silly to report to AIV given the current edits. I would not be shocked if you were a blocked user evading...but your comments weren't unacceptable to the conversation. Bugs just doesn't like new users and anons so in his mind they are all here for nefarious purposes. Challenge him, and it only makes it more clear that you are bad. --Onorem (talk) 02:33, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

It's ironic you have a "don't feed the trolls" logo, because that's exactly what you've done in this situation. This is at least the third recent IP for this DC-area troll, whose only purpose is harassment: (talk · contribs) (talk · contribs) (talk · contribs)
Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 03:30, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

You should have said something about that to start with. Since you didn't, it just looked like you were mad because his comment was directed at you. In any case, I see no problem with their post in response to your comment about someone else's RFA chances. Are we done? --Onorem (talk) 11:55, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Medeis investigated it. I knew it was the DC-based troll, but I thought quietly zapping it would fit the standard established in previous discussions. You caused this problem, by being an inattentive busybody. Act more wisely in the future. P.S. I never get mad here. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 12:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Please stop trolling. --Onorem (talk) 21:52, 31 December 2013 (UTC)


Ya also yawn, when there's a tiny lil boy being killed and Wikipedia fanatics have seized power and tell the world that the boy is a villain..

BIG UP.--[[Special:Contri-- (talk) 00:55, 19 January 2014 (UTC)butions/|]] (talk) 00:50, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

What the fuck are you talking about? Please make sense or shut the fuck up. Actually, just go away. --Onorem (talk) 00:51, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
I'm talking about the innocent boy called Trayvon Martin being killed by an over-zealous and crazy doorman called George Zimmerman and how friend's and fanatic supporters of the latter are ruling the depiction on Wikipedia. But that's probably matters you don't know much or care about.-- (talk) 00:55, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Just go to any pages regarding this shooting and see how these one-sided fanatics are hindering anybody to tell the truth and you're one step ahead.-- (talk) 00:56, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Oh. You're that troll. Get off my page. I don't have any interest in what you have to say. --Onorem (talk) 00:59, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
As you don't have interest in changing the world and do not care about the blatant misdepictions and -undoings. Big up, once again.-- (talk) 01:36, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
ok, I've conceded any depiction on Wikipedia is the utter truth and anyone questioning this is a troll. Thanks for your insight on this, I greatly appreciate this kind of behaviour!-- (talk) 01:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Yawn. Once again. You are a boring troll. Please go away. --Onorem (talk) 01:55, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Do I have to remind you it was you who had the infernal of contravening when it was all about the life of a young boy being taken away... and yet. YOU YAWN?-- (talk) 02:08, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Justin Bieber RfC[edit]

If you have time and the desire to re-engage in the debate over legal issues and polls at the Justin Bieber article ....pls comment at Talk:Justin Bieber#RfC: Behaviour and legal issues Thank you for your time. -- Moxy (talk) 04:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


I replied on my page in case you are interested Smith03 (talk) 01:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Your comment about me at WP:AN/ANI, a deal?[edit]

"Support if he agrees absolutely to abide by the decision that is handed down. I'd be happy to give him a voice on the RFCU if he'll go away when it's over (if that's the decision of course...)" Well, I am interested in making a deal with any administrator conditionally willing to unblock, to include for purposes of the RFC/U only. You misunderstand, I think, the nature of an RFC/U though. It is not supposed to provide a conclusion like a WP:AN/ANI section. It is rather supposed to enlighten Wikipedians, including its subject, on difficult questions that have resisted resolution. There is no "you lose/you win" outcome to an RFC/U. (I read up on it.) My intent when I asked GB_fan to work with me to open up the RFC/U was to get broader community input beyond the WP:AN/ANI blockaholic regulars that latched on to me many months ago, watchlisted my talkpage, and have been eagerly overwhelming any unblock effort ever since. You can see them at the RFC/U. The "block him" contingent are not editors that typically participate in RFCs or RFC/Us. Rather they watchlisted my talkpage and tracked me there against my will to criticize me once again. It is a strange way to enjoy one's participation in Wikipedia. I do not know what I will do when the RFC/U is done. I hope that it gives enough enlightenment of the facts to embolden a brave administrator to unblock me permanently. However if you are inclined to a deal, I promise to adhere to double-civility behavior, desist all IP-based block evasion, and only comment at the RFC/U talkpage (and at my own talkpage) if you unblock me for the duration of the RFC/U. This is Colton Cosmic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs)

I guess I did think that RFC/Us sometimes ended with decisions or sanctions. In any case, I'm fine with you being unblocked to participate in the discussion if you agree to leave if the discussion doesn't end with you being unblocked for other purposes. --Onorem (talk) 22:47, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


Why did you remove accurate sourced information from the trinity article?

Lede should be a concise summary[edit]

More details is in the Larry Sanger#Citizendium section. QuackGuru (talk) 01:51, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

I understand what the lede is for. I just think it is misleading with the current wording...and flows like shit. --Onorem (talk) 02:06, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't know what you want me to do. I did revert my edit and split the sentence back into two sentences. Here is the source. I'm not sure what I could do without a specific proposal to make the text more accurate. QuackGuru (talk) 02:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
I've made what I think is an improvement to the lede. The one source giving only 2 reasons for why it failed is still not satisfactory to me, but I don't care enough to look for more sources. --Onorem (talk) 02:14, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Comment from Biohazardblack[edit]

My apologies. I wasn't aware that Wikipedia had a policy of allowing only flattering commentary about someone who openly advocates for the murder of children. - biohazardblack

Not what happened, and even if it was, your addition to the article would not have been appropriate. --Onorem (talk) 01:19, 14 June 2014 (UTC)


Please follow: If you place a banner for an outside WikiProject, and a member of that project removes it, do not replace the banner. from Wikipedia:PROJGUIDE#OWN . Thank you. NotYetAnotherEconomist (talk) 13:00, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Go away. Thank you. --Onorem (talk) 14:00, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
There is a consensus on this issue. Votes are at the momen 1:0 (me being the 1). warm regards NotYetAnotherEconomist (talk) 16:43, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
You don't understand how wikiprojects work and you can't count. Congrats. --Onorem (talk) 16:45, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

A brief note[edit]

Hi Onorem. I just wanted to say that, while I disagreed with you some in that particular context, I do appreciate the good-faith intent behind your comment and your decision to remove both our postings so as to avoid adding extra volume to the discussion. Just for the record. ;) Snow talk 01:50, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Sorry if I came off too aggressive. I do hope the conversation ends up productive. I have no desire to participate myself, mostly because I'm trying to avoid the same people who TRM can't my own choice. It's just not worth it. They can enjoy their playground. --Onorem (talk) 03:00, 9 December 2014 (UTC)


Go off to Auschwitz, Seig Heil. Corrupt assholes like you not welcome here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk)

That's not evidence of anything. --Onorem (talk) 16:42, 11 December 2014 (UTC)


I felt it was clear that something was amiss in that image situation, and also that sometimes in a case like that, the person coming to ANI knows more than they can publicly say. SarekOfVulcan is a long-time editor, and I don't think he would have jumped to ANI if he didn't know something was "off", as it clearly was. Admin action was needed, but three posters right away downplayed the situation, including Samwalton9 saying it could have been "accidentally linking to the wrong image", when all the evidence was clear in only three posts that it was no accident, and it was perfectly clear which image it was.

I'm sorry to have offended you, but that's what I saw, and it troubles me when people brush off ANI reports. Best regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Not interested. I wasn't trying to brush it off. I was suggesting discussion. Sorry I missed the 'off' portion without it being presented directly, but I don't appreciate your comments. --Onorem (talk) 02:26, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Samwalton commented after you, and why the hell should I care what he has to say? Including Samwalton9....OMG. Guess who else is a long time editor? Me. --Onorem (talk) 02:29, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Again, I'm sorry to have offended you. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:32, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Have a good night. --Onorem (talk) 02:48, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
More again. I hate when I keep thinking. They were making a silly claim that very likely was wrong. There was no copyright concern for Wikipedia since the general quick consensus was that SoV was the original image rights holder. Why do I need a deeper understanding to know that there's plenty of time to discuss before drama? --Onorem (talk) 03:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Feel free to add it back into the article. I won't. Too many threats.[edit]

I know that you are supposed to be bold and all of that, but the amount of threats I've been given in the past few hours, and the severity of them has made me not want to come here. If you want to add it, then you do it, as you at least aren't being threatened. As for me, I am not interested in it any longer. A guy was blocked over it, and I got threatened with being blocked because I dared to suggest that the blocking may have been wrong. A lot more than a threat to be blocked too. It seems that I have stumbled on to a part of Wikipedia that is extraordinarily hostile. KrampusC (talk) 09:30, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy Holidays![edit]

Wikipedia Happy New Year.png Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello Onorem, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015.
Happy editing,
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:01, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list

Global account[edit]

Hi Onorem! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 11:46, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

WP:AN#The User:DangerousPanda page[edit]

I have started the discussion. Feel free to join in. --George Ho (talk) 03:43, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Well this is getting familiar[edit]

I thought you might want to know that User:Herecomesiggy is almost certainly a sock of User:Kevinschaffer, whom Ponyo has blocked (along with numerous of his other socks, at least two of which have been devoted to vandalizing and trolling on that page). Not sure how much difference it makes which rationale is on the user talk page, since they clearly won't try to appeal but will instead just make another throw-away account, but that's your call! Snow talk 13:21, 19 February 2015 (UTC)


I'd just back away and get out of the fire if I were you. No need to get all stressed out from that user. :) - Amaury (talk) 08:22, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for the catch![edit]

Just happened to be going through the revision history on my user page and saw this matter for the first time. Thanks for attending to that! Seems the vandal hasn't let up on poor Johnny Cash though in the last few months, have they? Snow let's rap 08:56, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Henderson Secondary Pic.JPG[edit]


Thanks for uploading File:Henderson Secondary Pic.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Onorem. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)